Non-redundant Subgroup Discovery in Large and Complex Data
- 4.1k Downloads
Large and complex data is challenging for most existing discovery algorithms, for several reasons. First of all, such data leads to enormous hypothesis spaces, making exhaustive search infeasible. Second, many variants of essentially the same pattern exist, due to (numeric) attributes of high cardinality, correlated attributes, and so on. This causes top-k mining algorithms to return highly redundant result sets, while ignoring many potentially interesting results.
These problems are particularly apparent with Subgroup Discovery and its generalisation, Exceptional Model Mining. To address this, we introduce subgroup set mining: one should not consider individual subgroups, but sets of subgroups. We consider three degrees of redundancy, and propose corresponding heuristic selection strategies in order to eliminate redundancy. By incorporating these strategies in a beam search, the balance between exploration and exploitation is improved.
Experiments clearly show that the proposed methods result in much more diverse subgroup sets than traditional Subgroup Discovery methods.
KeywordsQuality Measure Beam Search Subgroup Discovery Cover Count High Cardinality
- 1.Bringmann, B., Zimmermann, A.: The chosen few: On identifying valuable patterns. In: Proceedings of the ICDM 2007, pp. 63–72 (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Grünwald, P.D.: The Minimum Description Length Principle. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Klösgen, W.: Explora: A Multipattern and Multistrategy Discovery Assistant. In: Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 249–271 (1996)Google Scholar
- 7.Knobbe, A., Ho, E.K.Y.: Pattern teams. In: Proceedings of the ECML PKDD 2006, pp. 577–584 (2006)Google Scholar
- 12.Lemmerich, F., Rohlfs, M., Atzmüller, M.: Fast discovery of relevant subgroup patterns. In: Proceedings of FLAIRS (2010)Google Scholar
- 13.Mannila, H., Toivonen, H.: Multiple uses of frequent sets and condensed representations. In: Proceedings of the KDD 1996, pp. 189–194 (1996)Google Scholar