Advertisement

Defining Architectural Viewpoints for Quality Concerns

  • Bedir Tekinerdogan
  • Hasan Sözer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6903)

Abstract

A common practice in software architecture design is to apply architectural views to model the design decisions for the various stakeholder concerns. When dealing with quality concerns, however, it is more difficult to address these explicitly in the architectural views. This is because quality concerns do not easily match the architectural elements that seem to be primarily functional in nature. As a result, the communication and analysis of these quality concerns becomes more problematic in practice. We introduce a general and practical approach for supporting architects to model quality concerns by extending the architectural viewpoints of the so-called V&B approach. We illustrate the approach for defining recoverability and adaptability viewpoints for an open source software architecture.

Keywords

Software Architecture Modeling Architectural Views Quality Concerns 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Avizienis, A., et al.: Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 1(1), 11–33 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clements, P., et al.: Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garlan, D., Barnes, J.M., Schmerl, B.R., Celiku, O.: Evolution styles: Foundations and tool support for software architecture evolution. In: Proc. of the 7th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2009), pp. 131–140 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems (ISO/IEC 42010) (identical to ANSI/IEEE Std1471–2000) (July 2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kell, S.: A Survey of Practical Software Adaptation Techniques. Journal of Universal Computer Science 14(13), 2110–2157 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    MPlayer official website, http://www.mplayerhq.hu/ (accessed March 2010)
  7. 7.
    Sözer, H., Tekinerdogan, B., Akşit, M.: FLORA: A Framework for Decomposing Software Architecture to Introduce Local Recovery. Wiley Software Practice and Experience Journal 39(10), 869–889 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software Systems Architecture – Working with Stakeholders using Viewpoints and Perspectives. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bedir Tekinerdogan
    • 1
  • Hasan Sözer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringBilkent UniversityBilkentTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Computer EngineeringOzyegin UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations