An Investigation into Facebook Friend Grouping

  • Patrick Gage Kelley
  • Robin Brewer
  • Yael Mayer
  • Lorrie Faith Cranor
  • Norman Sadeh
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6948)

Abstract

With increasingly large friend networks, Facebook users may be losing sight of exactly with whom they are sharing content they post to Facebook. When Facebook released a new privacy interface in sum- mer 2010 they simplified privacy controls; however, group-based permis- sions remain at the core of fine-grained privacy control. In order to use these fine-grained controls, users must be able to accurately and usefully specify friend groups. In a series of 46 semi-structured interviews, we investigated how participants group their online friends using four differ- ent grouping methods. Our results show that these different mechanisms alter the strategies and groups that users create, that groups created a priori need further refinement before they can adequately address pri- vacy decisions, and that users are adapting their online behavior to avoid the need to specify groups in the current Facebook interface. We con- clude with several recommendations that would allow users improved group-based access control.

Keywords

grouping online social networks privacy access control 

References

  1. 1.
    Acquisti, A., Gross, R.: Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the facebook. In: Privacy Enhancing Technology Symposium (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams, P.: The real life social network v2, http://www.slideshare.net/padday/the-real-life-social-network-v2
  3. 3.
    Berteau, S.: Facebook’s Misrepresentation of Beacon’s Threat to Privacy: Tracking users who opt out or are not logged in (November 29, 2007), http://community.ca.com/blogs/securityadvisor/archive/2007/11/29/facebook-s-misrepresentation-of-beacon-s-threat-to-privacy-tracking-users-who-opt-out-or-are-not-logged-in.aspx
  4. 4.
    Binder, J., Howes, A., Sutcliffe, A.: Conflicting social spheres and experienced tension in social networking sites. In: CHI (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carr, A.: Facebook’s New Groups, Dashboards, and Downloads Explained (October 6, 2010), http://www.fastcompany.com/1693443/facebooks-big-announcements-dashboards-personal-information-downloads-friend-group-lists
  6. 6.
    Davis, S., Gutwin, C.: Using relationship to control disclosure in awareness servers. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface GI 2005, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, pp. 145–152. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gates, G.: Facebook Privacy: A Bewildering Tangle of Options (September 18 ,2010), http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/05/12/business/facebook-privacy.html
  8. 8.
    Jones, S., O’Neil, E.: Feasibility of structural network clustering for group-based privacy control in social networks. In: SOUPS (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kwasnik, B.: How a personal document’s intended use or purpose affects its classification in an office. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1989, pp. 207–210. ACM, New York (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lampinen, A., Tamminen, S., Oulasvirta, A.: All my people right here, right now: Management of group co-presence on a social networking site. In: International Conference on Supporting Group Work (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lederer, S., Hong, I., Dey, K., Landay, A.: Personal privacy through understanding and action: five pitfalls for designers. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 8, 440–454 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malone, T.W.: How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1, 99–112 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marsden, R.: Facebook unveils its latest trick but the implications are worrying (September 18, 2010), http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/facebook-unveils-its-latest-trick-ndash-but-the-implications-are-worrying-2082708.html
  14. 14.
    Mccarty, C.: Structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure 3 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mervis, C., Rosch, E.: Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology 32, 89–115 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ostrow, A.: FACEBOOK FIRED: 8% of US Companies Have Sacked Social Media Miscreants (August 10, 2009), http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/social-media-misuse/
  17. 17.
    Preibusch, S.: W3c workshop on privacy for advanced web apis. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1213 (July 2010), http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/slides/preibusch.pdf
  18. 18.
    Reeder, R., Bauer, L., Cranor, L.F., Reiter, M., Bacon, K., How, K., Strong, H.: Expandable grids for visualizing and authoring computer security policies. In: CHI (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smart, D.: How do people limit their behaviour in response to their perception of potential social tension? A study of Facebook. Manchester Business School Bsc Interactive Systems Design (2009), http://intranet.cs.man.ac.uk/Intranetsubweb/library/3yrep/2009/7024300.pdf
  20. 20.
    Stangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C., Glass, B.: Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(2), 207–218 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Gage Kelley
    • 1
  • Robin Brewer
    • 2
  • Yael Mayer
    • 3
  • Lorrie Faith Cranor
    • 1
  • Norman Sadeh
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie Mellon UniversityUnited States
  2. 2.University of MarylandUnited States
  3. 3.Harvey Mudd CollegeUnited States

Personalised recommendations