ESA 2011: Algorithms – ESA 2011 pp 799-810 | Cite as

Cover-Decomposition and Polychromatic Numbers

  • Béla Bollobás
  • David Pritchard
  • Thomas Rothvoß
  • Alex Scott
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6942)

Abstract

A colouring of a hypergraph’s vertices is polychromatic if every hyperedge contains at least one vertex of each colour; the polychromatic number is the maximum number of colours in such a colouring. Its dual, the cover-decomposition number, is the maximum number of disjoint hyperedge-covers. In geometric settings, there is extensive work on lower-bounding these numbers in terms of their trivial upper bounds (minimum hyperedge size & degree). Our goal is to get good lower bounds in natural hypergraph families not arising from geometry. We obtain algorithms yielding near-tight bounds for three hypergraph families: those with bounded hyperedge size, those representing paths in trees, and those with bounded VC-dimension. To do this, we link cover-decomposition to iterated relaxation of linear programs via discrepancy theory.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gupta, R.P.: On the chromatic index and the cover index of a mulltigraph. In: Alavi, Y., Lick, D.R. (eds.) Theory and Applications of Graphs: Int. Conf. Kalamazoo, May 11-15. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 642, pp. 204–215. Springer, Heidelberg (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andersen, L.D.: Lower bounds on the cover-index of a graph. Discrete Mathematics 25, 199–210 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alon, N., Berke, R., Buchin, K., Buchin, M., Csorba, P., Shannigrahi, S., Speckmann, B., Zumstein, P.: Polychromatic colorings of plane graphs. Discrete & Computational Geometry 42(3), 421–442 (2009); Preliminary version appeared in Proc. 24th SOCG, pp. 338–345 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pálvölgyi, D.: Decomposition of Geometric Set Systems and Graphs. PhD thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, arXiv:1009.4641 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elekes, M., Mátrai, T., Soukup, L.: On splitting infinite-fold covers. Fund. Math. 212, 95–127 (2011); arXiv:0911.2774Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Könemann, J., Parekh, O., Pritchard, D.: Max-weight integral multicommodity flow in spiders and high-capacity trees. In: Bampis, E., Skutella, M. (eds.) WAOA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5426, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pach, J., Tardos, G., Tóth, G.: Indecomposable coverings. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 52, 451-463 (2009); Preliminary version in Proc. 7th CJCDGCGT (2005), pp. 135-148 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moser, R.A., Tardos, G.: A constructive proof of the general Lovász Local Lemma. J. ACM 57 (2010); Preliminary version in Proc. 41st STOC, pp. 343–350 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buchsbaum, A.L., Efrat, A., Jain, S., Venkatasubramanian, S., Yi, K.: Restricted strip covering and the sensor cover problem. In: Proc. 18th SODA, pp. 1056–1063 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibson, M., Varadarajan, K.: Decomposing coverings and the planar sensor cover problem. In: Proc. 50th FOCS, pp. 159–168 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pach, J., Tardos, G.: Tight lower bounds for the size of epsilon-nets. In: Proc 27th SoCG, pp. 458–463 (2011) arXiv:1012.1240Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feige, U., Halldórsson, M.M., Kortsarz, G., Srinivasan, A.: Approximating the domatic number. SIAM J. Comput. 32, 172–195 (2002); Preliminary version appeared in Proc. 32nd STOC, pp. 134–143 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Călinescu, G., Chekuri, C., Vondrák, J.: Disjoint bases in a polymatroid. Random Struct. Algorithms 35, 418–430 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pach, J.: Decomposition of multiple packing and covering. In: Kolloquium über Diskrete Geometrie, Salzburg, Inst. Math. U. Salzburg, pp. 169–178 (1980)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aloupis, G., Cardinal, J., Collette, S., Imahori, S., Korman, M., Langerman, S., Schwartz, O., Smorodinsky, S., Taslakian, P.: Colorful strips. In: López-Ortiz, A. (ed.) LATIN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6034, pp. 2–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keszegh, B., Pálvölgyi, D.: Octants are cover decomposable (2011); arXiv:1101.3773 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keszegh, B.: Weak conflict free colorings of point sets and simple regions. In: Proc. 19th CCCG (2007); Extended version “Coloring half-planes and bottomless rectangles” at arXiv:1105.0169Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cheriyan, J., Jordán, T., Ravi, R.: On 2-coverings and 2-packings of laminar families. In: Nešetřil, J. (ed.) ESA 1999. LNCS, vol. 1643, pp. 510–520. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheilaris, P., Keszegh, B., Pálvölgyi, D.: Unique-maximum and conflict-free colorings for hypergraphs and tree graphs. In: Proc. 7th Japanese-Hungarian Symp. Disc. Math. Appl., pp. 207–216 (2011); arXiv:1002.4210Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Erlebach, T., Jansen, K.: The maximum edge-disjoint paths problem in bidirected trees. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 14, 326–355 (2001); Preliminary version in Proc. 9th ISAAC (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Erdős, P., Lovász, L.: Problems and results on 3-chromatic hypergraphs and some related questions. In: Hajnal, A., Rado, R., Sós, V.T. (eds.) Infinite and Finite Sets (Coll. Keszthely, 1973). Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai, vol. 10, pp. 609–627. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1975)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alon, N., Spencer, J.H.: The Probabilistic Method, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beck, J., Fiala, T.: “Integer-making” theorems. Discrete Applied Mathematics 3, 1–8 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thomassen, C.: The even cycle problem for directed graphs. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 5, 217–229 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Béla Bollobás
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Pritchard
    • 3
  • Thomas Rothvoß
    • 4
  • Alex Scott
    • 5
  1. 1.University of MemphisUSA
  2. 2.University of CambridgeUK
  3. 3.EPFLLausanneSwitzerland
  4. 4.MITCambridgeUSA
  5. 5.Mathematical InstituteUniversity of OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations