A Multi-Layer ‘Gas of Circles’ Markov Random Field Model for the Extraction of Overlapping Near-Circular Objects

  • Jozsef Nemeth
  • Zoltan Kato
  • Ian Jermyn
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6915)

Abstract

We propose a multi-layer binary Markov random field (MRF) model that assigns high probability to object configurations in the image domain consisting of an unknown number of possibly touching or overlapping near-circular objects of approximately a given size. Each layer has an associated binary field that specifies a region corresponding to objects. Overlapping objects are represented by regions in different layers. Within each layer, long-range interactions favor connected components of approximately circular shape, while regions in different layers that overlap are penalized. Used as a prior coupled with a suitable data likelihood, the model can be used for object extraction from images, e.g. cells in biological images or densely-packed tree crowns in remote sensing images. We present a theoretical and experimental analysis of the model, and demonstrate its performance on various synthetic and biomedical images.

Keywords

Active Contour Markov Random Field Tree Crown Image Domain Active Contour Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blaskovics, T., Kato, Z., Jermyn, I.: A Markov random field model for extracting near-circular shapes. In: IEEE Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 1073–1076. IEEE, Cairo (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., Sapiro, G.: Geodesic active contours. International Journal of Computer Vision 22(1), 61–79 (1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen, L.: On active contour models and balloons. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing: Image Understanding 53, 211–218 (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cremers, D., Tischhauser, F., Weickert, J., Schnorr, C.: Diffusion snakes: Introducing statistical shape knowledge into the Mumford-Shah functional. International Journal of Computer Vision 50(3), 295–313 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flach, B., Schlesinger, D.: Combining shape priors and MRF-segmentation. In: da Vitoria Lobo, N., Kasparis, T., Roli, F., Kwok, J.T., Georgiopoulos, M., Anagnostopoulos, G.C., Loog, M. (eds.) S+SSPR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5342, pp. 177–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geman, S., Geman, D.: Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6, 721–741 (1984)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horvath, P., Jermyn, I.H.: A ‘gas of circles’ phase field model and its application to tree crown extraction. In: Proceedings of European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Poznan, Poland (September 2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horvath, P., Jermyn, I., Kato, Z., Zerubia, J.: A higher-order active contour model of a ‘gas of circles’ and its application to tree crown extraction. Pattern Recognition 42(5), 699–709 (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision 1(4), 321–331 (1988)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kato, Z., Berthod, M., Zerubia, J.: A hierarchical Markov random field model and multi-temperature annealing for parallel image classification. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing: Graphical Models and Image Processing 58(1), 18–37 (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rochery, M., Jermyn, I.H., Zerubia, J.: Higher order active contours. International Journal of Computer Vision 69(1), 27–42 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11263-006-6851-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rochery, M., Jermyn, I.H., Zerubia, J.: Phase field models and higher-order active contours. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Beijing, China (October 2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rousson, M., Paragios, N.: Shape priors for level set representations. In: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (eds.) ECCV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2351, pp. 78–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Russell, C., Metaxas, D., Restif, C., Torr, P.: Using the \(\textsl{P}^n\) Potts model with learning methods to segment live cell images. In: IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1–8. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Srivastava, A., Joshi, S., Mio, W., Liu, X.: Statistical shape analysis: Clustering, learning, and testing. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27(4), 590–602 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jozsef Nemeth
    • 1
  • Zoltan Kato
    • 1
  • Ian Jermyn
    • 2
  1. 1.Image Processing and Computer Graphics DepartmentUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical SciencesDurham UniversityDurhamUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations