System-Level Power-Accuracy Trade-Off in Bluetooth Low Energy Networks

  • Jürgen Sommer
  • Simon Lüders
  • Stephen Schmitt
  • Wolfgang Rosenstiel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6905)


Location awareness is a key service in mobile devices. For indoor localization, radio frequency (RF) based distance estimation methods are the most viable. An economically favorable method using RF is received signal strength indication (RSSI) as there is no additional hardware required in the mobile devices. Localization is performed relative to fixed landmark nodes. Bluetooth (BTH) is a widely available standard that can be employed for such purpose. This work explores the potential of BTH and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) protocols in terms of power consumption and position accuracy. At time of writing there are no known simulators with support for BLE. The major contribution of this work is the design of a simulation infrastructure that supports BLE.


Mobile Device Receive Signal Strength Indication Network Device Indoor Position Power Saving Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bluetooth SIG, Inc.: Bluetooth core specification v4.0 (June 2010),
  2. 2.
    Cano, J.C., Cano, J.M., González, E., Calafate, C., Manzoni, P.: Evaluation of the energetic impact of bluetooth low-power modes for ubiquitous computing applications. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Wireless Ad Hoc, Sensor and Ubiquitous Networks, PE-WASUN 2006. ACM, New York (2006), Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fox, D., Hightower, J., Liao, L., Schulz, D., Borriello, G.: Bayesian filtering for location estimation. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2, 24–33 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, H., Darabi, H., Banerjee, P., Liu, J.: Survey of wireless indoor positioning techniques and systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C 37(6), 1067–1080 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mautz, R.: Overview of current indoor positioning systems. Geodesy and Cartography 35(1), 18–22 (2009), CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Negri, L., Sami, M., Macii, D., Terranegra, A.: Fsm–based power modeling of wireless protocols: the case of bluetooth. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, ISLPED 2004, pp. 369–374. ACM, New York (2004), Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Negri, L., Zanetti, D.: Power/performance tradeoffs in bluetooth sensor networks. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 9, p. 236b (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Open SystemC Initiative: SystemC Version 2.0, User’s Guide (2001),
  9. 9.
    Seidel, S.Y., Rappaport, T.S.: 914 MHz path loss prediction for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 40, 207–217 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sommer, J., Lüders, S., Subramanian, S., Schmitt, S., Rosenstiel, W.: SySifoS: SystemC simulator for sensor and communication systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Technology, Applications and Systems, Mobility 2009. ACM, New York (2009), Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen Sommer
    • 1
  • Simon Lüders
    • 1
  • Stephen Schmitt
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Rosenstiel
    • 1
  1. 1.Wilhelm-Schickard-Institut für Informatik Department of Computer EngineeringUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations