Advertisement

Towards Knowledge Oriented Personal Health Systems

  • Juha Puustjärvi
  • Leena Puustjärvi
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 69)

Abstract

Although current e-health tools such as personal health records have proven to be useful they still have many shortages. Especially, they do not provide effective means for querying personal health information. They also fail in information therapy, i.e., in providing the right information to right people at right time. In addition, they are totally passive, although through automating the control of patients health information we could significantly and cost-effectively improve the quality of patient-centered healthcare. In this paper, we describe our designed a knowledge oriented active personal health system, which does not suffer from these shortcomings. Its key components are the personal health ontology and the alerts. Through the ontology we can provide data expressive queries and avoid the problem of limited information supply, and through the alerts we can provide active elements for controlling patient’s health information. We present the ontology in a graphical form and in OWL, and give rules for transforming the ontology into relational model. We also present how the alerts can be implemented by the triggers supported by relational database systems.

Keywords

E-health tools Patient-centered healthcare Personal health records Information therapy Ontologies OWL RDF SOA Relational database system triggers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bauman, A., Fardy, H., Harris, H.: Getting it right; why bother with patient centred care? Medical Journal of Australia 179(5), 253–256 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gillespie, R., Florin, D., Gillam, S.: How is patient-centred care understood by the clinical, managerial and lay stakeholders responsible for promoting this agenda? Health Expectations 7(2), 142–148 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Little, P., Everitt, H., Williamson, I.: Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. British Medical Journal, 908–911 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michie, S., Miles, J., Weinman, J.: Patient-centredness in chronic illness: what is it and does it matter? Patient Education and Counselling, 197–206 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stewart, M.: Towards a global definition of patient centred care: The patient should be the judge of patient centred care. British Medical Journal 322, 444–445 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thompson, A.: Moving beyond the rhetoric of citizen involvement: Strategies for enablement. Eurohealth 9(4), 5–8 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Puustjärvi, J., Puustjärvi, L.: Designing and Implementing Personal Health Records. In: Proc. of the IADIS International Conference WWW/INTERNET 2009, pp. 205–212 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    XML Path Language (XPath), http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath
  9. 9.
    XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language, http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/
  10. 10.
    Butcher, L.: What the devil is information therapy? Managed Care (June 2007), http://www.managedcaremag.com/archives/0706/0706.infotherapy.html
  11. 11.
    Frost, A., Sullivan: White paper: Information Based Medicine: Better Patient Care By Better-Informed Physicians, http://jobfunctions.bnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=156158
  12. 12.
    Kemper, D.: White paper: The Business Case for Information therapy, http://www.informationtherapy.org/publications/documents/e068.pdf
  13. 13.
    Puustjärvi, J., Puustjärvi, L.: Automating the Dissemination of Information Entities to Healthcare Professionals. In: Papasratorn, B., Chutimaskul, W., Porkaew, K., Vanijja, V. (eds.) IAIT 2009. CCIS, vol. 55, pp. 123–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davies, J., Fensel, D., Harmelen, F.: Towards the semantic web: ontology driven knowledge management. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In: Padua Workshop on Formal Ontology (March 1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    OWL – WEB OntologyLanguage, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
  17. 17.
    RDF – Resource Description Language, http://www.w3.org/RDF/
  18. 18.
    Harold, E., Scott Means, W.: XML in a Nutshell. O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    The RDF Query Language (RQL), http://139.91.183.30:9090/RDF/RQL/
  20. 20.
    SPARQL Query Language for RDF, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
  21. 21.
    Continuity of Care Record (CCR) Standard, http://www.ccrstandard.com/
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Ullman, J., Widom, J.: Principles of Database Systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juha Puustjärvi
    • 1
  • Leena Puustjärvi
    • 2
  1. 1.Helsinki University of TechnologyTKKFinland
  2. 2.The Pharmacy of KaivopuistoHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations