Advertisement

A Structured Approach for Assessing Sustainable Best Practices in Supply Chains

  • Wojciech PiotrowiczEmail author
  • Richard Cuthbertson
Chapter
Part of the EcoProduction. Environmental Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing book series (ECOPROD)

Abstract

This book chapter presents a structured approach to assess supply chain practices. The proposed solution incorporates sustainability dimensions into the evaluation process—considering social, economic and environmental impacts—and can be applied to select supply chain practices that can help to reduce the negative impact of transport, while improving long-term economic performance. Although there is no universal practice that can be applied across all business and national contexts, based on the extensive analysis of various supply chain practices across Europe, the most common ‘generic’ solutions used to improve supply chain are presented. The analysis of each ‘generic’ practice includes its social, economic and environmental impact, as well as its drivers and limitations, which should be considered when new implementation takes place.

Keywords

Supply chain assessment Best practices Sustainable development Supply chain performance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this chapter was completed within the European Commission BestLog (Best Practices in Logistics) project. The project consortium included: Technische Universitat Berlin, Logistics Department; University of St. Gallen, Chair of Logistics Management; METTLE Groupe; Reliant s.r.l.; Warsaw School of Economics, Logistics Department; Packaging, Transport and Logistics Institute (ITENE); Saïd Business School, University of Oxford; Chalmers University of Technology and European Logistics Association.

References

  1. BestLog (2007) Existing methods of benchmarking. Best practices in logistics, BestLog project reportGoogle Scholar
  2. Carroll JM, Swatman PA (2000) Structured-case: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research. Eur J Inf Syst 9(4):235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cetinkaya B, Cuthbertson R, Ewer G, Klaas-Wissing T, Piotrowicz W, Tyssen C (2011) Sustainable supply chain management: practical ideas for moving towards best practice. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuthbertson R, Piotrowicz W (2008) Supply chain best practices: identification and categorisation of measures and benefits. Int J Productivity Perform Manage 57(5):389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cuthbertson R, Piotrowicz W (2009) Transferring best practices. In: Rutkowski K (ed) Best practices in logistics and supply management. Warsaw School of Economics, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  6. EC (2006a) Commission staff working document: freight transport logistics in Europe—the key to sustainable mobility. Appendix: summary of the impact assessment—points for reflection. Commission of the European Communities, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  7. EC (2006b) Commission staff working document: freight transport logistics in Europe—the key to sustainable mobility. Impact assessment. Commission of the European Communities, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. EC (2007) Sustainable development. European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  9. Gunasekaran A (2001) Performance measurement and benchmarking in manufacturing. Int J Oper Prod Manage 21(1–2):9–14Google Scholar
  10. Laugen BT, Acur N, Boer H, Frick J (2005) Best manufacturing practices: what do the best-performing do? Int J Oper Prod Manage 25(2):131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Piotrowicz W (2008) Designing closed-loop supply chains: implementation of the WEEE directive in the UK. Eur Retail Digest 56:12–15Google Scholar
  12. Piotrowicz W, Cuthbertson R, Islei G (2007) Sustainable supply chains: a framework for best practice assessment. Results of the pilot study, BestLog project. In: Markatos M, Stamou K, Belrao A et al (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd IASME/WSEAS international conference on energy, environment, ecosystems and sustainable development (EEESD’07), Crete, Greece, WSEAS, pp 455–464Google Scholar
  13. Shepherd C, Gunter H (2006) Measuring supply chains: current research and future directions. Int J Productivity Perform Manage 55(3/4):242–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sulogtra (2002) Effects on transport of trends in logistics and supply chain management. Final Publishable Report. Sulogtra ProjectGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saïd Business SchoolUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations