On the Benefit of Forward Error Correction at IEEE 802.11 Link Layer Level

  • Floris van Nee
  • Pieter-Tjerk de Boer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6955)

Abstract

This study examines the error distribution of aggregated MPDUs in 802.11n networks and whether or not forward error correction like raptor coding at the link layer would be useful in these networks. Several experiments with Qualcomm 4x4 802.11n hardware were performed. Two devices were used in a data link, while a third device sniffed all transmitted packets. The collected data was analyzed and used to calculate the packet error rate which would be obtained if FEC was used in order to determine whether FEC is useful at the link layer. It is shown that the error distribution of A-MPDUs does not follow the binomial distribution. Because of this, the performance of FEC in real networks is worse than for theoretical cases where a binomial distribution is assumed. Therefore, other ways to decrease the packet error rate have more impact than forward error correction.

Keywords

Medium Access Control Error Distribution Wireless Local Area Network Forward Error Correction Data Frame 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alay, O., Korakis, T.: An Experimental Study of Packet Loss and Forward Error Correction in Video Multicast over IEEE 802.11b Network. In: Proceedings of IEEE CCNC (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Combs, G.: Wireshark (December 2010), http://www.wireshark.org
  3. 3.
    Ginzburg, B., Kesselman, A.: Performance analysis of A-MPDU and A-MSDU aggregation in IEEE 802.11n. In: 2007 IEEE Sarnoff Symposium, pp. 1–5 (April 2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haratcherev, I., Taal, J.: Automatic IEEE 802.11 rate control for streaming applications. Wireless Communications And Mobile Computing 5, 421–437 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    IEEE Computer Society. Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications. IEEE Draft P802.11-REVmb/D4.0 (June 2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    NLANR/DAST. Iperf (December 2010), http://sourceforge.net/projects/iperf
  7. 7.
    Perahia, E., Stacey, R.: Next Generation Wireless LANs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qualcomm. Raptorq technical overview (December 2010), http://www.qualcomm.com/documents/files/raptorq-technical-overview.pdf
  9. 9.
    Samokhina, M., Moklyuk, K., Choi, S., Heo, J.: Raptor Code-Based Video Multicast over IEEE 802.11 WLAN. In: IEEE APWCS (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Floris van Nee
    • 1
  • Pieter-Tjerk de Boer
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations