Bell's Theorem and Quantum Realism pp 59-97 | Cite as
Schrödinger’s Paradox and Nonlocality
Chapter
First Online:
Abstract
In the previous chapter, we reviewed the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox and Bell’s Theorem. EPR is a very powerful result, and when its logical content is distilled, this famous analysis leads to a striking conclusion—the existence of physical properties lying outside the purview of the quantum description.
Keywords
Entangle State Hide Variable Perfect Correlation Bohmian Mechanic Quantum Nonlocality
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
- 1.Brown, H.R., Svetlichny, G.: Nonlocality and Gleason’s Lemma. Part I Deterministic Theories. Found. Phys. 20, 1379 (1990)Google Scholar
- 2.Heywood, P., Redhead, M.L.G.: Nonlocality and the Kochen-Specker Paradox. Found. Phys. 13, 481 (1983)Google Scholar
- 3.Aravind, P.K.: Bell’s theorem without inequalities and only two distant observers. Found. Phys. Lett. 15, 399–405 (2002)Google Scholar
- 4.Cabello, A.: Bell’s theorem without inequalities and only two distant observers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1911–1914 (2001)Google Scholar
- 5.Bassi, A., Ghirardi, G.C.: The Conway-Kochen Argument and relativistic GRW Models. Found. Phys. 37, 169 (2007). Physics archives: arXiv:quantph/610209Google Scholar
- 6.Tumulka, R.: Comment on ‘The Free Will Theorem’. Found. Phys. 37, 186–197 (2007). Physics archives: arXic:quant-ph/0611283Google Scholar
- 7.Goldstein, S., Tausk, D., Tumulka, R., Zanghí, N.: What does the free will theorem actually prove? Notices AMS 57(11):1451–1453 (2010) arXiv:0905.4641v1 [quant-ph]Google Scholar
- 8.Schrödinger, E.: Die gegenwA rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften 23 807–812, 823–828, 844–849 (1935). The English translation of this work - ‘The present situation in quantum mechanics’ - appears. In: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124, 323–338 (1980) (translated by J. Drimmer), and can also be found in [21, p. 152]Google Scholar
- 9.Schrödinger, E.: Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31, 555 (1935)Google Scholar
- 10.Schrödinger, E.: Probability relations between separated systems. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 32, 446 (1936)Google Scholar
- 11.Bohm, D.: Quantum Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1951)Google Scholar
- 12.Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Con quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935). Reprinted in [21, p. 138]Google Scholar
- 13.Conway, J., Kochen, S.: “The Free Will Theorem” Found. Phys. 36(10); 1441–1473 (2006). Physics archives arXiv:quant-ph/0604079Google Scholar
- 14.Conway, J., Kochen, S.: The strong Free Will Theorem. Notices AMS 56(2), 226–232 Feb 2009Google Scholar
- 15.Peres, A.: Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
- 16.Bell, J.S.: Bertlemann’s socks and the nature of reality Journal de Physique. Colloque C2, suppl. au numero 3, Tome 42 1981 pp. C2 41–61. Reprinted in [22, p. 139]Google Scholar
- 17.Bell, J.S.: On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev. Modern Phys. 38 447–452 (1966). Reprinted in [22, p. 1] and [21, p. 397]Google Scholar
- 18.Bell, J.S.: On the impossible pilot wave. Found. Phys. 12 989–999 (1982) Reprinted in [22, p. 159]Google Scholar
- 19.Schilpp, P.A.: Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Harper and Row, New York (1949)Google Scholar
- 20.Bell, J.S.: Quantum mechanics for cosmologists. p. 611 in: Quantum Gravity. vol. 2 Isham, C., Penrose, R., Sciama, D. (eds.) Clarendon Press, Oxford (1981). Reprinted in [22, p. 117]Google Scholar
Copyright information
© The Author(s) 2012