Citizen Engagement with Information Aggregation Markets

  • Efthimios Bothos
  • Dimitris Apostolou
  • Gregoris Mentzas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6847)


Participatory governance entails converting citizens from passive users of administrative decisions into active participants of political procedures. Public institutions and organizations can benefit from methods and tools able to aggregate and interpret information dispersed among citizens. In this paper we explore the use of Information Aggregation Markets (IAMs) for citizen engagement. We identify the benefits of IAMs and explain how markets can be used to aggregate citizens’ opinions and views on policy issues. Furthermore we report on two real life cases where we deployed IAMs to assist the decision making processes of public organizations. The positive feedback from participants and decision makers provides empirical evidence on the benefits of IAMs as a method for engaging citizens in public policy decision making.


Information aggregation markets public participation citizen engagement 


  1. 1.
    Rowe, G., Frewer, L.J.: A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science Technology and Human Values 30(2), 251–290 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Communications & Strategies (65), 17–37 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lin, K.J.: Building Web 2.0. IEEE Computer 40, 101–102 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kapetanios, E.: Quo Vadis computer science: From Turing to personal computer, personal content and collective intelligence. Data & Knowledge Engineering 67(2), 286–292 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spann, M., Skiera, B.: Internet-Based Virtual Stock Markets for Business Forecasting. Management Science 49, 1310–1326 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    OECD. Citizens as Partners: Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making: OECD (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Macintosh, A.: Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making. In: The Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37), Big Island, Hawaii (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peters, J., Abud, M.: E-consultation: Enabling democracy between elections. IRPP Choices 15(1) (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coleman, S., Gøtze, J.: Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. Journal Information Polity 7(4) (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phang, C.W., Kankanhalli, A.: A Research Framework for Citizen Participation via eConsultation. In: Proceedings of AMCIS 2005, Paper 145 (2005),
  11. 11.
    Parry, G., Moyser, G., Day, N.: Political participation and democracy in Britain. Cambridge University Press, New York (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Green, D., Shapiro, I.: Pathologies of rational choice theory. Yale University Press, New Haven (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verba, S., Schlozman, K., Brady, H.: Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seyd, P., Whiteley, P.: Labor’s grass roots: The politics of party membership. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pattie, C., Syed, P., Whiteley, P.: Citizenship and civic engagement: attitudes and behavior. Presented at the Political Studies Association Annual Conference. University of Aberdeen, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    DeSanctis, G., Gallupe, R.B.: A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science 33(5), 586–609 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McLeod, P.L., Elston, S.E.: Persuasive linguistic devices in computer-supported group discussion. In: Proceedings of Twenty-Eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 20–31. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Connolly, T., Jessup, L.M., Valacich, J.S.: Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups. Management Science 36(6), 689–703 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shepherd, M.M., Briggs, R.O., Reinig, B.A., Yen, J., Nunamaker, J.F.: Invoking social comparison to improve electronic brainstorming: Beyond anonymity. Journal of Management Information Systems 12(3), 155–170 (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fulk, J., Flanagin, A.J., Kalman, M.E., Monge, P.R., Ryan, T.: Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory 6(1), 60–87 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Monge, P., Fulk, J., Kalman, M., Flanagin, A., Parnassa, C., Rumsey, S.: Production of collective action in alliance-based interorganizational communication and information systems. Organization Science 9(3), 411–433 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tziralis, G., Tatsiopoulos, I.: Prediction Markets: An Extended Literature Review. The Journal of Prediction Markets 1, 75–91 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cherry, S.: Bet on it! Can a stock market of ideas help companies predict the future? IEEE Spectrum 44, 48–53 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Millard, J., Nielsen, M.M., Warren, R., Smith, S., Macintosh, A., Tarabanis, K., Tambouris, E., Panopoulou, E., Efpraxia, D., Parisopoulos, K.: European eParticipation Summary Report (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dahan, E., Soukhoroukova, A., Spann, M.: Preference markets: Organizing securities markets for opinions surveys with infinite scalability. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27(7), 937–954 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    LaComb, C.A., Barnett, J.A., Pan, Q.: The imagination market. Information Systems Frontiers 9, 245–256 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bothos, E., Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G.: Collective intelligence for idea management with Internet-based information aggregation markets. Internet Research 19(1), 26–41 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hanson, R.: Decision Markets for Policy Advice. In: Patashnik, E., Gerber, A. (eds.) Promoting the General Welfare: American Democracy and the Political Economy of Government Performance. Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ledyard, J.: Design of information markets for policy analysis. In: Hahn, Tecklock (eds.) Information Markets: a New Way of Making Decisions. The American Enterprise Institute Press (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hahn, R.W., Tetlock, P.C.: Using information markets to improve public decision making. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 29, 213–289 (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Manski, C.: Interpreting the Predictions of Prediction Markets. Economic Letters 91(3), 425–429 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gjerstad, S.: Risk Aversion, Beliefs, and Prediction Market Equilibrium, mimeo University of Arizona (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wolfers, J., Zitzewitz, E.: Prediction markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(2), 107–126 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Servan-Schreiber, E., Wolfers, J., Pennock, D., Galebach, B.: Prediction Markets: Does Money Matter? Electronic Markets - The International Journal 14(3), 243–251 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds. Random House, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hanson, R.D.: Logarithmic market scoring rules for modular combinatorial information aggregation. Journal of Prediction Markets 1(1), 3–15 (2007)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Graefe, A.: Group Decision Making - Meetings, Nominal Groups, Delphi, and Prediction Markets Compared. In: Third Workshop on Prediction Markets, Chicago, USA (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Efthimios Bothos
    • 1
  • Dimitris Apostolou
    • 2
  • Gregoris Mentzas
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Communication and Computer SystemsNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.University of PiraeusPiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations