iLeger: A Web Based Application for Participative Elections

  • Artur Afonso Sousa
  • Pedro Agante
  • Luís Borges Gouveia
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6847)


iLeger is a Web Application that seeks to concentrate, in a single place, the stakeholders in a political election allowing multi-directional and structured communication between them. Using a citizen and candidate centered approach; iLeger supports collaborative interaction with the purpose of fostering communication, deliberation and participation. This paper aims at presenting the main functionalities of this Web application, as well as the results from a case study about the Portuguese Presidential Elections held in 2011.


Elections Campaigning eDemocracy eParticipation Deliberation 


  1. 1.
    Creighton, J.L.: The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanford, C., Rose, J.: Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management 27, 406–421 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Putnam, R.D.: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coleman, S., Blumer, J.: The Internet and Democratic Citizenship - Theory, Practice and Policy, pp. 166–197. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chadwick, A., Howard, P.: New Directions in Internet Politics Research. In: Chadwick, A., Howard, P. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, pp. 1–9. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Macintosh, A., Coleman, S., Schneeberger, A.: eParticipation: The Research Gaps. In: Macintosh, A., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2009. LNCS, vol. 5694, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ParticipateDB, (accessed March 13, 2011)
  8. 8.
    Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: eParticipation Initiatives in Europe: Learning from Practitioners. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Glassey, O. (eds.) ePart 2010. LNCS, vol. 6229, pp. 54–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seelye, K.: Asked Millions Reply. The Caucus - The Politics and Government Blog of the Times. New York Times, (accessed May 7, 2010)
  10. 10.
    Smith, A.: The Internet’s Role in Campaign 2008. Pew Research Center (2009) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    SmartVote, (accessed March 15, 2011)
  12. 12.
    CNN ElectionCenter2008, (accessed May 6, 2010)
  13. 13.
    Abgeordneten, (accessed May 20, 2010)
  14. 14.
    Taylor-Smith, E., Lindner, R.: Using Social Networking Tools to Promote eParticipation Initiatives. In: Prosser, A., Parycek, P. (eds.) Proceedings of EDEM 2009 - Conference on Electronic Democracy, Vienna, pp. 115–121 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wright, S.: Government-run Online Discussion Fora: Moderation, Censorship and the Shadow of Control. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 8(4), 550–568 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coleman, S., Gøtze, J.: Bowling Together - Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation. Information Polity 7(4), 247–252 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tomkova, J.: E-consultations: New tools for civic engagement or facades for political correctness? European Journal of ePractice 7, 45–54 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aichholzer, G., Westholm, H.: Evaluating eParticipation Projects: Practical Examples and Outline of an Evaluation Framework. European Journal of ePractice 7, 27–44 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Artur Afonso Sousa
    • 1
  • Pedro Agante
    • 2
  • Luís Borges Gouveia
    • 3
  1. 1.Polytechnic Institute of ViseuViseuPortugal
  2. 2.LibertriumViseuPortugal
  3. 3.University Fernando PessoaPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations