Advertisement

Power and Participation in Digital Late Modernity: Towards a Network Logic

  • Jakob Svensson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6847)

Abstract

Through theories of mediatization it is commonly understood that political institutions and participatory practices adapt to the logics of mass media. Today the overall media and communication landscape is becoming digitalized. Technological processes of digitalization evolve in tandem with socio-cultural processes of reflexivity and individualization in late modernity. Thus politics and participation will be adapting to an increasingly digitalized and individualized media and communication landscape. This is a theoretical paper with an aim to critically analyze how contemporary media and communication landscape will influence practices of participation. Through the concept of network logic it is argued that users are disciplined into responsive and reflexive communication and practices of constant updating. As a result of this political participation will be more expressive and increasingly centered around identity negotiation.

Keywords

Digital Late Modernity Identity Network Logic Political Participation Power 

References

  1. 1.
    Leaning, M.: The Internet, Power and Society: Rethinking the Power of the Internet to Change Lives, Chandos, Oxford (2009) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altheide, D.L.: Media Logic and Political Communication. Political Communication 21, 293–296 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hjarvard, S.: The Mediatization of Society A theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change. Nordicom Review 2008(2), 105–134 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kepplinger, H.M.: Mediatization of Politics, Theory and Data. Journal of Communciation, 972-986 (December 2002) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Street, J.: Politics and Popular Culture. Polity Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dahlgren, P.: Media and Political Engagement. Citizens, Communication, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Medierådet: Unga & Medier. Fakta om barns och ungas användning och upplevelser av medier (Youth & Media 2010. Facts about children’s and youths’ use and perceptions of media), Kulturdepartementet, Stockholm (2010) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bauman, Z.: The Individualized Society. Polity Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beck, U.: Att uppfinna det politiska; Bidrag till en teori om reflexiv modernisering. To Invent Politics. Contribution to a Theory of Reflexive Modernization, Daidalos, Göteborg (1995) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giddens, A.: Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lasch, C.: The Culture of Narcissism. American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. W. W. Norton & Company, New York (1991), first published 1979Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Svensson, J.: The Expressive Turn of Citizenship in Digital Late Modernity. JeDEM –eJournal of eDemocracy 3(1), 42–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderson, C.: The Long Tail – How Endless Choice Is Creating Unlimited Demand. Random house business books, London (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benkler, Y.: The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hilts, A., Yu, E.: Modeling Social Media Support for Elicitation of Citizen Opinion. In: MSN 2010, Toronto, ON Canada (June 13, 2010) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jenkins, H.: Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York university Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shirky, C.: Here Comes Everybody. How Change Happen when People Come Together. Penguin Books Ltd., London (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coleman, S., Blumler, J.: The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory Practice and Policy. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kies, R.: Promises and Limits of Web-deliberations. Palgrave MacMillan, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schweitzer, E.: Mediatized Politics on the Internet. Evidience From a Multi-Level Analysis of German Online Campaigns in State, National, and European Parliamentary Elections. Paper presentedt at the 3rd Eurpoean Communication Conference of the European Communication Research and Education association (ECREA), Hamburg, Germany (2010) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Asp, K.: Mäktiga massmedier: Studier om politisk opinionsbildning. Powerful Mass Media: Studies of Political Opinion Formation. Akademilitteratur, Stockholm (1986) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Reilly, T.: What Is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (2005), http://www.oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
  23. 23.
    Ellison, N., boyd, d.: Social Network Sites: Definition, History and Scholarship. Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1) (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bruns, A.: Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond. From Production to Produsage. Peter Lang, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Andrejevic, M.: I Spy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dewey, J.: The Public and its Problems. Ohio University Press, Athens (1927)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Livingstone, S.: Taking Risky Opportunities in Youthful Content Creation: Teenagers’ Use of Social Networking Sites for Intimacy, Privacy and Self-expression. New Media & Society 10(3), 393–411 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pröitz, L.: Mobile Media and Genres of the Self. In: Storsul, T., Stuedahl, D. (eds.) Ambivalence Towards Convergence: Digitalization and Media Change, Nordicom, Göteborg (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller, V.: New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture. Convergence - The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14(4), 387–400 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Manovich, L.: The Language of New Media. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Foucault, M.: Truth and Juridical Forms. In: Faubion, J.D. (ed.) Power - Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, vol. 3. Penguin Books, London (1994), first published 1973Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Foucault, M.: The Political Technology of Individuals. In: Faubion, J.D. (ed.) Power - Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, vol. 3. Penguin Books, London (1994), first published 1988Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Donath, J., boyd, D.: Public Displays of Connection. BT Technology Journal 22(4) (2004)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Castells, M.: The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arendt, H.: The Human Condition, 2nd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1998), first published 1958Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hodkinson, P.: Interactive Online Journals and Individualization. New Media & Society 9(4), 625–650 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Foucault, M.: Subject and Power. In: Faubion, J.D. (ed.) Power - Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, vol. 3, Penguin Books, London (1994), first published 1982Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thompson, J.B.: Medierna & moderniteten. Media and Modernity, Daidalos, Göteborg (2001), first published 1995 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Anduiza, E.: The Internet, election campaigns and citizens: state of affairs. Quaderns del CAC, 5–12 (December 2009) Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Svensson, J.: Nina on the Net. A Study of A Politician campaigning on Social Networking Sites. Central European Journal of Communication (2011) (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sunstein, C.: Republic.com. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2001)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang, W., Johnson, T.J., Seltzer, T., Bichard, S.L.: The Revolution Will be Networked. The Influence of Social Networking Sites on Political Attitudes and Behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 75–92 (Feburary 2010) Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Eliasoph, N.: Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everday Life. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Postill, J.: Localizing the Internet beyond Communities and Networks. New Media & Society 10(3), 413–430 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jakob Svensson
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations