Advertisement

Process Risk Management Using Configurable Process Models

  • Raimar Scherer
  • Wael Sharmak
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 362)

Abstract

Almost no construction project performs totally as planned as dynamic changes are frequently needed. These changes can be ascribed to the high uncertainty, which is evaluated as potential causes of risks and risks is in turn are evaluated as potential causes of plan changes. Several concepts from the Business Process Modeling domain are adopted to build an explicit process-oriented knowledge documentation of the construction processes. A standardized process description is suggested that offers flexibility in its content to be usable in different contexts. Configurable fragments in the course of the process models express the uncertain parts of the process. A general structure of a Configurable Reference Process Model (CRPM) is developed as an ontology model to document the construction processes in a Process-oriented Knowledge base. By using this knowledge base a considerable planning effort will be saved. Moreover, the quality of the process schedules, since they will be derived from the reference process models, will be enhanced and the expenditure of time will be reduced.

Keywords

Uncertainty Risk Change Configuration Business Process Modeling Reference Process Model 

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, S., Peña-Mora, F., Park, M.: Web-enabled System Dynamics Model for Error and Change Management on Concurrent Design and Construction Projects. ASCE, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 20(4), 290–300 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sun, M., Senaratne, S., Fleming, A., Motowa, I., Lin Yeoh, M.: A change management toolkit for construction projects. In: Architectural Engineering and Design Management. University of the West of England, University Press/Springer-Verlag, UK (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hao, Q., Shen, W., Neelamkavil, J., Thomas, R.: Change Management in Construction Projects. In: Rischmoller, L. (ed.) Proc. 25th W78 Conf., Improving the Management of Construction projects Through IT Adoption, Santiago, Chile (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    PMBOK Guide: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sharmak, W., Schapke, S.-E., Scherer, R.J.: Risk Treatment Templates for Configurable Reference Modeling in the Construction Industry. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Picard, W. (eds.) Pervasive Collaborative Networks. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol. 283, pp. 233–240. Springer, Boston (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mendling, J., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.: Generating Correct EPCs from Configured C-EPCs. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, France (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gomez-Perez, A., Fernandez-Lopez, M., Corcho-Garcia, O.: Ontological Engineering: With examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer Publishing, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raimar Scherer
    • 1
  • Wael Sharmak
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Construction InformaticsTU DresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations