Results of the European Land Robot Trial and Their Usability for Benchmarking Outdoor Robot Systems

  • Frank E. Schneider
  • Dennis Wildermuth
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6856)

Abstract

It is generally a problematic task to compare different approaches and methods in the field of outdoor robotics [1]. In the majority of cases, results are reported only for a specific robotic system. All tasks are solved in a static and often specially defined environment, making it hard to compare the outcome with results from other research groups, other approaches, and other robots. The commonly used means of “proof by video” or “proof by (one) example” are insufficient for obvious reasons. As one possible solution, robot competitions can be a benchmark for real robot systems [2].

References

  1. 1.
    Del Pobil, A.P.: Why do we need benchmarks in robotics research? In: Proceedings of the IROS 2006 Workshop on Benchmarks in Robotics Research, Beijing (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Behnke, S.: Robot competitions – Ideal benchmarks for robotics research. In: Proceedings of the IROS 2006 Workshop on Benchmarks in Robotics Research, Beijing (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The RoboCup© Federation, http://www.robocup.org
  4. 4.
    The official RoboGames website, http://robogames.net
  5. 5.
    Robotika.cz outdoor delivery challenge (Robotour), http://robotika.cz/competitions/robotour/en
  6. 6.
    The Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) Foundation, http://www.auvsifoundation.org
  7. 7.
    The European Land Robot Trial (ELROB), http://www.elrob.org
  8. 8.
    Schneider, F.E., Wildermuth, D., Brüggemann, B., Röhling, T.: European Land Robot Trial (ELROB) – Towards a Realistic Benchmark for Outdoor Robotics. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Robotics in Education (RIE), Bratislava (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank E. Schneider
    • 1
  • Dennis Wildermuth
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for CommunicationInformation Processing and Ergonomics (FKIE)WachtbergGermany

Personalised recommendations