A Validation of Localisation Accuracy Improvements by the Combined Use of GPS and GLONASS

  • Dennis Wildermuth
  • Frank E. Schneider
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6856)


For autonomous navigation in outdoor environments, robust and reliable positioning is an indispensable prerequisite. Looking at unstructured or a priori unknown surroundings the use of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) is a reasonable approach [1]. The Global Positioning System (GPS) is definitely the most popular GNSS. There are several efforts to build competing GNSS, from which only the Russian GLONASS is nearly operational. Nowadays, even recreation-grade GPS receivers often achieve an accuracy of less than 10m. But, since this is still not enough for many localisation and navigation tasks, several techniques have been developed to improve the positioning accuracy. In principle, all these methods use differential data coming from a base station at a well-known position. The GPS receiver applies the differential information in order to eliminate error sources like signal delays or inaccurate satellite orbits. Depending on the used method, this is called Code Differential GPS (DGPS) or Real Time Kinematics (RTK). Using sufficiently sophisticated receivers, with DGPS accuracy in the metre range can be reached. For RTK systems centimetre or even millimetre ranges are achievable.


  1. 1.
    Cooper, S., Durrant-Whyte, H.: A Kalman Filter for GPS Navigation of Land Vehicles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Munich, pp. 157–163 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuter, N., Kuter, S.: Accuracy comparison between GPS and DGPS: A field study at METU campus. Italian Journal of Remote Sensing 42(3), 3–14 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dammalage, T.L., Samarakoon, L.: Test Results of RTK and Real-Time DGPS Corrected Observations Based on Ntrip Protocol. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 37(B2), 1119–1123 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danskin, S.D., Bettinger, P., Jordan, T.R., Cieszewski, C.: A Comparison of GPS Performance in a Southern Hardwood Forest: Exploring Low-Cost Solutions for Forestry Applications. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 33(1), 9–16 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morales, Y., Tsubouchi, T.: GPS moving performance on open sky and forested paths. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), San Diego, pp. 3180–3185 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ohno, K., Tsubouchi, T., Shigematsu, B., Yuta, S.: Outdoor Navigation of a Mobile Robot between Buildings based on DGPS and Odometry Data Fusion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Taipei, pp. 1978–1984 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Wildermuth
    • 1
  • Frank E. Schneider
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for CommunicationInformation Processing and Ergonomics (FKIE)WachtbergGermany

Personalised recommendations