Advertisement

A Blueprint for Event-Driven Business Activity Management

  • Christian Janiesch
  • Martin Matzner
  • Oliver Müller
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6896)

Abstract

Timely insight into a company’s business processes is of great importance for operational efficiency. However, still today companies struggle with the inflexibility of monitoring solutions and reacting to process information on time. We review the current state of the art of business process management and analytics and put it in relation to complex event processing to explore process data. Following the tri-partition in complex event processing of event producer, processor, and consumer, we develop an architecture for event-driven business activity management which is capable of delivering blueprints for flexible business activity monitoring as well as closed loop action to manage the full circle of automated insight to action. We close with a discussion of future research directions.

Keywords

Reference architecture complex event processing business process management business process analytics business activity management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Word, J.: Business Network Transformation: Strategies to Reconfigure Your Business Relationships for Competitive Advantage. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Janiesch, C.: Implementing Views on Business Semantics: Model-based Configuration of Business Documents. In: 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), St. Gallen, pp. 2050–2061 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    zur Muehlen, M., Shapiro, R.: Business Process Analytics. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management: Strategic Alignment, Governance, People and Culture, pp. 137–157. Springer, Berlin (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Costello, C., Molloy, O.: Towards a Semantic Framework for Business Activity Monitoring and Management. In: AAAI 2008 Spring Symposium: AI Meets Business Rules and Process Management, pp. 1–11. AAAI Press, Stanford (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nesamoney, D.: BAM: Event-driven Business Intelligence for the Real-Time Enterprise. DM Review 14, 38–40 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hermosillo, G., Seinturier, L., Duchien, L.: Using Complex Event Processing for Dynamic Business Process Adaptation. In: 7th IEEE International Conference on Service Computing (SCC), Miami, FL, pp. 466–473 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosemann, M., Recker, J., Flender, C., Ansell, P.: Understanding Context-Awareness in Business Process Design. In: 17th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Adelaide, pp. 1–10 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Object Management Group Inc.: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Specification 1.0 (2006), http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/OMG%20Final%20Adopted%20BPMN%201-0%20Spec%2006-02-01.pdf
  9. 9.
    Davenport, T.: Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johansson, H.J., McHugh, P., Pendlebury, A.H., Wheeler, W.A.: Business Process Reengineering: Breakpoint Strategies for Market Dominance. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    zur Muehlen, M., Indulska, M.: Modeling Languages for Business Processes and Business Rules: A Representational Analysis. Information Systems 35, 379–390 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M. (eds.): Process Management: A Guide for the Design of Business Processes. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pedrinaci, C., Domingue, J., de Medeiros, A.K.A.: A Core Ontology for Business Process Analysis. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 49–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Verbeek, H.M.W., Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: XES Tools. In: CAiSE Forum 2010. CEUR, vol. 592, pp. 1–8 (2010) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Etzion, O., Niblett, P.: Event Processing in Action. Manning Publications, Cincinnati, OH (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grigori, D., Casati, F., Castellanos, M., Dayal, U.: Business Process Intelligence. Computers in Industry Journal 53, 321–343 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Reijers, H.A., Weijters, A.: Business Process Mining: An Industrial Application. Information Systems 32, 713–732 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Han, J., Kamber, M.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eckert, M.: Complex Event Processing with XChange EQ: Language Design, Formal Semantics, and Incremental Evaluation for Querying Events. LMU München: Faculty of Mathematics, München (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCoy, D.W.: Business Activity Monitoring: Calm Before the Storm. Gartner Research Note LE-15-9727 (2002), http://www.gartner.com/resources/105500/105562/105562.pdf
  21. 21.
    Bianchi, M., Boyle, M., Hollingsworth, D.: A Comparison of Methods for Trend Estimation. Applied Economics Letters 6, 103–109 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Luckham, D.: The Power of Events: An Introduction to Complex Event Processing in Distributed Enterprise Systems. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC): Business Process Analytics Format Draft Version 2.0 (2008), http://www.wfmc.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=437&Itemid=72
  24. 24.
    Zang, C., Fan, Y., Liu, R.: Architecture, Implementation and Application of Complex Rvent Processing in Enterprise Information Systems Based on RFID. Information Systems Frontiers 10, 543–553 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    von Ammon, R., Ertlmaier, T., Etzion, O., Kofman, A., Paulus, T.: Integrating Complex Events for Collaborating and Dynamically Changing Business Processes. In: 2nd Workshop on Monitoring, Adaptation and Beyond (MONA+), Stockholm, pp. 1–16 (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Janiesch
    • 1
  • Martin Matzner
    • 2
  • Oliver Müller
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods (AIFB)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS)University of MünsterMünsterGermany
  3. 3.Hilti Chair of Business Process ManagementUniversity of LiechtensteinVaduzLiechtenstein

Personalised recommendations