Advertisement

Interoperability for the Design and Construction Industry through Semantic Web Technology

  • Pieter Pauwels
  • Ronald De Meyer
  • Jan Van Campenhout
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6725)

Abstract

The domain of architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) has experienced significant improvements with the advent of building information modelling (BIM) applications, which allow AEC specialists to model all information concerning a building design into one three-dimensional building model. Much of these improvements are however generated by the mere availability of such an environment, whereas many more improvements were expected by achieving an appropriate interoperability of information. We are investigating why such an interoperability is not reached fully and consider the semantic web as an alternative approach to reach the targeted interoperability. In this paper, an AEC description framework based on semantic web technology is presented and compared to the BIM approach, after which we indicate how it might solve the issue of interoperability more appropriately. Our evaluation of this investigation indicates the semantic web approach as a valid alternative approach, although considerably more research is needed to show it capable of providing the targeted interoperability of information in the AEC domain.

Keywords

Building Information Modelling Building Element Industry Foundation Class Design Entity Building Information Modelling Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Eastman, C.M., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K.: BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Architects, Engineers, Contractors, and Fabricators. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becerik-Gerber, B., Rice, S.: The perceived value of building information modeling in the US building industry. ITcon 15, 185–201 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liebich, T., Adachi, Y., Forester, J., Hyvarinen, J., Karstila, K., Reed, K., Richter, S., Wix, J.: Industry Foundation Classes IFC2x Edition 3 Technical Corrigendum 1, http://www.iai-tech.org/ifc/IFC2x3/TC1/html/index.htm
  4. 4.
    Pazlar, T., Turk, Z.: Interoperability in practice: geometric data exchange using the IFC standard. ITcon 13, 362–380 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verstraeten, R., Pauwels, P., De Meyer, R., Meeus, W., Van Campenhout, J., Lateur, G.: IFC-based calculation of the Flemish energy performance standard. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Product and Process Modelling, pp. 437–443. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284, 35–43 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pauwels, P., Verstraeten, R., De Meyer, R., Van Campenhout, J.: Semantics-based design: can ontologies help in a preliminary design phase? Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal 3, 263–276 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gallagher, M.P., O’Connor, A.C., Dettbar, J.L., Gilday, L.T.: Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. NIST Report GCR 04-867 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    International Alliance for Interoperability, http://www.iai-tech.org/
  10. 10.
    Web3D Consortium, X3D International Specification Standards, http://www.web3d.org/x3d/specifications/x3d/
  11. 11.
    3D Systems, Stereolithography interface specification (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yurchyshyna, A., Zarli, A.: An ontology-based approach for formalisation and semantic organisation of conformance requirements in construction. Automation in Construction 18, 1084–1098 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beetz, J., van Leeuwen, J., de Vries, B.: IfcOWL: A case of transforming EXPRESS schemas into ontologies. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 23, 89–101 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pauwels, P., Van Deursen, D., Verstraeten, R., De Roo, J., De Meyer, R., Van de Walle, R., Van Campenhout, J.: A semantic rule checking environment for building performance checking. Automation in Construction 20, 506–518 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pauwels, P., Van Deursen, D., De Roo, J., Van Ackere, T., De Meyer, R., Van de Walle, R., Van Campenhout, J.: 3D information exchange over the semantic web for the domain of architecture, engineering and construction. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 25 (in press, 2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kraft, B., Nagl, M.: Visual knowledge specification for conceptual design: definition and tool support. Advanced Engineering Informatics 21, 67–83 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    W3C Semantic Web Portal, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
  18. 18.
    Manola, F., Miller, E.: RDF Primer - W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/
  19. 19.
    Brickley, D., Guha, R.V.: RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema - W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/
  20. 20.
    McGuinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview - W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
  21. 21.
    Grant, J., Beckett, D.: RDF Test Cases - W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/
  22. 22.
    Beckett, D., Berners-Lee, T.: Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language - W3C Team Submission, January 14 (2008), http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/
  23. 23.
    Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF - W3C Recommendation, January 15 (2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    SPARQL endpoint for IFC/RDF graphs, http://ninsuna.elis.ugent.be/SPARQLEndpoint/
  26. 26.
    Verswijver, K., De Meyer, R.: Past and present characteristics of Vierendeel’s poutre arcades. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Structures and Architecture (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vierendeel, A.: Girder or Beam for Bridges. USA Patent #639,320, p. 3 (1899)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter Pauwels
    • 1
  • Ronald De Meyer
    • 1
  • Jan Van Campenhout
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Urban PlanningGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Information SystemsGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations