Process Mining for Electronic Data Interchange
Choreography modeling and service integration received a lot of attention in the last decade. However, most real-world implementations of inter-organizational systems are still realized by traditional Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) standards. In traditional EDI standards, the notion of process or choreography is not explicitly specified. Rather, every business document exchange stands for its own. This lack of process awareness in traditional EDI systems hinders organizations from applying Business Process Management (BPM) methods in such settings. To address this shortcoming, we seek to derive choreographies from EDI message exchanges. Thereby, we employ and extend process mining techniques, which have so far concentrated on business processes within single organizations. We discover the interaction sequences between the partners as well as the business information conveyed in the exchanged documents, which goes beyond the state-of-the-art in process mining. As a result, we lift the information gained on the IT level to the business level. This enables us to derive new insights that help organizations to improve their performance, e.g., an organization may get insights into the value of its business partnerships to support an efficient decision making process. This way we hope to bring the merits of BPM to inter-organizational systems realized by traditional EDI standards.
Keywordsprocess mining EDI EDIFACT inter-organizational business processes
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Berge, J.: The EDIFACT Standards. Blackwell Publishers, Inc., Malden (1994)Google Scholar
- 4.de Medeiros, A.K.A., Pedrinaci, C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Domingue, J., Song, M., Rozinat, A., Norton, B., Cabral, L.: An Outlook on Semantic Business Process Mining and Monitoring. In: Chung, S., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2007, Part II. LNCS, vol. 4806, pp. 1244–1255. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.de Medeiros, A.K.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pedrinaci, C.: Semantic Process Mining Tools: Core Building Blocks. In: 16th European Conference on Information Systems (2008)Google Scholar
- 6.Foxvog, D., Bussler, C.: Ontologizing EDI: First Steps and Initial Experience. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Data Engineering Issues in E-Commerce, pp. 49–58 (2005)Google Scholar
- 7.Foxvog, D., Bussler, C.J.: Ontologizing EDI semantics. In: Roddick, J., Benjamins, V.R., Si-said Cherfi, S., Chiang, R., Claramunt, C., Elmasri, R.A., Grandi, F., Han, H., Hepp, M., Lytras, M.D., Mišić, V.B., Poels, G., Song, I.-Y., Trujillo, J., Vangenot, C. (eds.) ER Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4231, pp. 301–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hill, N., Ferguson, D.: Electronic Data Interchange: A Definition and Perspective. EDI Forum: The Journal of Electronic Data Interchange 1, 5–12 (1989)Google Scholar
- 10.Liegl, P., Huemer, C., Pichler, C.: A Bottom-up Approach to Build XML Business Document Standards. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, pp. 56–63. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Pham, T.T.: Mining of EDI Data for Performance Measurement of a Supply Chain. DICentral Corporation (2003) (unpublished)Google Scholar
- 18.Verbeek, H.M.W., Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: XES, XESame, and ProM 6. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Mylopoulos, J., Sadeh, N.M., Shaw, M.J., Szyperski, C., Soffer, P., Proper, E. (eds.) Information Systems Evolution. LNBIP, vol. 72, pp. 60–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Vollmer, K., Gilpin, M., Stone, J.: B2B Integration Trends: Message Formats. Forrester Research (2007)Google Scholar