HAID 2011: Haptic and Audio Interaction Design pp 110-119 | Cite as
Auditory Brain-Computer/Machine-Interface Paradigms Design
Conference paper
Abstract
The paper discusses novel and interesting, from users’ point of view, design of auditory brain-computer/machine interfaces (BCI/ BMI) utilizing human auditory responses. Two concepts of auditory stimuli BCI/BMI are presented. The first paradigm is based on steady-state tonal or musical stimuli yielding satisfactory EEG response classification for several seconds long stimuli. The second discussed paradigm is based on spatial sound localization and the brain evoked responses estimation, requiring shorter than a second stimuli presentation. In conclusion the preliminary results are discussed and suggestions for further applications are drawn.
Keywords
brain-computer-interface brain-machine-interface auditory neurosciencePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Bendor, D., Wang, X.: Differential neural coding of acoustic flutter within primate auditory cortex. Nature Neuroscience 10, 763–771 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: Libsvm: a library for support vector machines (2007)Google Scholar
- 3.Chen, M., Rutkowski, T.M., Jelfs, B., Souretis, G., Cao, J., Mandic, D.: Assessment of nonlinearity in brain electrical activity: A DVV approach. In: Proceedings of The 2007 RISP International Workshop on Nonlinear Circuits and Signal Processing, March 3-7, pp. 461–464. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Cichocki, A., Washizawa, Y., Rutkowski, T., Bakardjian, H., Phan, A.H., Choi, S., Lee, H., Zhao, Q., Zhang, L., Li, Y.: Noninvasive BCIs: Multiway signal-processing array decompositions. Computer 41(10), 34–42 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Guger, C., Daban, S., Sellers, E., Holzner, C., Krausz, G., Carabalona, R., Gramatica, F., Edlinger, G.: How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? Neuroscience Letters 462(1), 94–98 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hjorth, B.: EEG analysis based on time domain properties. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 29, 306–310 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Huang, N., Shen, Z., Long, S., Wu, M., Shih, H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.C., Tung, C., Liu, H.: The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 454(1971), 903–995 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 8.Niedermeyer, E., Da Silva, F.L. (eds.): Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore (2004)Google Scholar
- 9.Plourde, G.: Auditory evoked potentials. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 20(1), 129–139 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2008), http://www.R-project.org, http://www.R-project.org
- 11.Ross, B., Picton, T.W., Herdman, A.T., Hillyard, S.A., Pantev, C.: The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology 22, 1–4 (2004)Google Scholar
- 12.Rutkowski, T.M., Cichocki, A., Mandic, D.P.: Information Fusion for Perceptual Feedback: A Brain Activity Sonification Approach. In: Signal Processing Techniques for Knowledge Extraction and Information Fusion. Signals and Communication, pp. 261–274. Springer, Heidelberg (April 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Rutkowski, T.M., Cichocki, A., Mandic, D.P.: Spatial auditory paradigms for brain computer/machine interfacing. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on the Principles And Applications of Spatial Hearing 2009 (IWPASH 2009), Miyagi-Zao Royal Hotel, Sendai, Japan, p. 5 (November 11-13, 2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814299312_0025
- 14.Rutkowski, T.M., Cichocki, A., Tanaka, T., Mandic, D.P., Cao, J., Ralescu, A.L.: Multichannel spectral pattern separation - an EEG processing application. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2009), pp. 373–376. IEEE Press, Taipei (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rutkowski, T.M., Tanaka, T., Zhao, Q., Cichocki, A.: Spatial auditory BCI/BMI paradigm - Multichannel EMD approach to brain responses estimation. In: Proceedings of the Second APSIPA Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC 2010), December 14-17, pp. 197–202. APSIPA, Biopolis (2010)Google Scholar
- 16.Schlögl, A., Brunner, C.: Biosig: A free and open source software library for BCI research. Computer 41(10), 44–50 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Schreuder, M., Blankertz, B., Tangermann, M.: A new auditory multi-class brain-computer interface paradigm: Spatial hearing as an informative cue. PLoS ONE 5(4), e9813 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0009813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Stach, B.A.: The auditory steady-state response: A primer. The Hearing Journal 55(9), 10–18 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging: Statistical parametric mapping - SPM8 package (2010), http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/
- 20.Zhao, Q., Rutkowski, T., Zhang, L., Cichocki, A.: Generalized optimal spatial filtering using a kernel approach with application to EEG classification. Cognitive Neurodynamics 4(4), 355–358 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11571-010-9125-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011