Open Government Data: A Stage Model

  • Evangelos Kalampokis
  • Efthimios Tambouris
  • Konstantinos Tarabanis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6846)

Abstract

Public sector information constitutes a valuable primary material for added-value services and products, which however remains unexploited. Recently, Open Government Data (OGD) initiatives emerged worldwide aiming to make public data freely available to everyone, without limiting restrictions. Despite its potential however there is currently a lack of roadmaps, guidelines and benchmarking frameworks to drive and measure OGD progress. This is particularly true as proposed stage models for measuring eGovernment progress focus on services and do not sufficiently consider data. In this paper, we capitalize on literature on eGovernment stage models and OGD initiatives to propose a stage model for OGD. The proposed model has two main dimensions, namely organizational & technological complexity and added value for data consumers. We anticipate the proposed model will open up a scientific discussion on OGD stage models and will be used by practitioners for constructing roadmaps and for benchmarking just like the European Union stage model is currently used for measuring public service online sophistication.

Keywords

Stage model open data eGovernment data integration 

References

  1. 1.
    European Commission: Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Re-use of Public Sector Information: review of Directive 2003/98/EC – [SEC, 597] (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    eContent: Commercial exploitation of Europe’s public sector information (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newberry, D., Bently, L., Pollock, R.: Models of Public Sector Information Provision via Trading Funds (2008), http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file45136.pdf
  5. 5.
    Dekkers, M., Polman, F., Velde, R., de Vries, M.: MEPSIR: Measuring European Public Sector Information Resources. Final Report of Study on Exploitation of public sector information – benchmarking of EU framework conditions (2006), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/docs/pdfs/mepsir/final_report.pdf
  6. 6.
    European Commission: Public Sector Information: A Key Resource for Europe, COM, 585 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    eEurope2002: Creating a EU Framework for the Exploitation of Public Sector Information, COM, 607 final (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The Irish Public Service Metadata Standard, IPSMS (2002), http://www.gov.ie/webstandards/metastandards/intro.html
  9. 9.
    Robinson, D., Yu, H., Zeller, W.P., Feltern, E.W.: Government Data and the Invisible Hand Yale J.L. & Tech., vol. 11, p. 160 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: A Classification Scheme for Open Government Data: Towards Linking Decentralized Data. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology 6(3), 266–285 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Layne, K., Lee, J.: Developing fully functional E-Government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 18(2), 122–136 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klievink, B., Janssen, M.: Realizing joined-up government - Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation. Government Information Quarterly 26(2), 275–284 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siau, K., Long, Y.: Synthesizing e-government stage models – a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems 105(4), 443–458 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, J.: 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly 27(3), 220–230 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Giant Global Graph (2007), http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/215
  16. 16.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data—The Story So Far. Special Issue on Linked Data, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(3), 1–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    European Commission Directorate General for Information Society and Media: Smarter, Faster, Better eGovernment. 8th eGovernment Benchmark Measurement (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deloitte Research: At the dawn of E-Government: The citizen as customer (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    West, D.M.: E-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review 64(1), 15 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Andersen, K.V., Henriksen, H.Z.: E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly 23, 236–248 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Center for Democracy & Technology, The e-Government handbook for developing countries: A project of InfoDev and the Center for Democracy & Technology. Center for Democracy & Technology, CDT, Washington, D.C (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Design issues: Linked data (2006), updated (2010), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
  23. 23.
    W3C: Publishing Open Government Data. W3C Working draft (2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/gov-data/

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evangelos Kalampokis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Efthimios Tambouris
    • 1
    • 2
  • Konstantinos Tarabanis
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Informatics and Telematics InstituteCentre for Research and TechnologyHellasGreece
  2. 2.University of MacedoniaThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations