Web Information Systems Portfolios: A Contribution to Pragmatics

  • Klaus-Dieter Schewe
  • Bernhard Thalheim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 75)

Abstract

On a high level of abstraction the storyboard of a Web Information System (WIS) specifies who will be using the system, in which way and for which goals. Storyboard pragmatics deals with the question what the storyboard means for its users. One part of pragmatics is concerned with usage analysis by means of life cases, user models and contexts. In this paper we address another part of pragmatics that complements usage analysis by WIS portfolios. These comprise two parts: the information portfolio and the utilisation portfolio. The former one is concerned with information consumed and produced by the WIS users, which leads to content chunks. The latter one captures functionality requirements, which depend on the specific category the WIS belongs to. Here we concentrate on information services and community WISs.

Keywords

Pragmatics Web information system Information portfolio Utilisation portfolio Information services Community systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carroll, J.M.: Participatory design of community information systems - the designer as bard. In: COOP, pp. 1–6 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ceri, S., Fraternali, P., Bongio, A., Brambilla, M., Comai, S., Matera, M.: Designing Data-Intensive Web Applications. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Troyer, O., Leune, C.: WSDM: A user-centered design method for web sites. In: Computer Networks and ISDN Systems – Proc. 7th Intern. WWW Conference, pp. 85–94. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J., Nicchiarelli, E., Sebastiani, R.: Reasoning with goal models. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (eds.) ER 2002. LNCS, vol. 2503, pp. 167–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harel, D., Marelly, R.: Come, Let’s play: Scenario-based programming using LSCs and the play-engine. Springer, Berlin (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Houben, G.-J., Barna, P., Frasincar, F., Vdovjak, R.: HERA: Development of semantic web information systems. In Third International Conference on Web Engineering – ICWE 2003. In: Cueva Lovelle, J.M., Rodríguez, B.M.G., Gayo, J.E.L., Ruiz, M. (eds.) ICWE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2722, pp. 529–538. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kensing, F., Blomberg, J.: Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7(3/4), 167–185 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lowe, D.G., Henderson-Sellers, B., Gu, A.: Web Extensions to UML: Using the MVC Triad. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (eds.) ER 2002. LNCS, vol. 2503, pp. 105–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moritz, T., Noack, R., Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B.: Intention-driven screenography. In: Mayr, H.C., Karagiannis, D. (eds.) Information Systems Technology and its Applications – Proc. ISTA 2007. LNI, vol. P-107, pp. 128–139. GI (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moritz, T., Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B.: Strategic modelling of web information systems. International Journal on Web Information Systems 1(4), 77–94 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Noack, R., Thalheim, B.: Patterns for screenography. In: Kaschek, R., Kop, C., Steinberger, C., Fliedl, G. (eds.) Information Systems and e-Business Technologies, Proc. UNISCON 2008. LNBIP, vol. 5, pp. 484–495. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’Neill, E., Johnson, P.: Participatory task modelling: users and developers modelling users’ tasks and domains. In: TAMODIA, pp. 67–74 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pruitt, J., Adlin, T.: The Persona Lifecycle. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robertson, J., Robertson, S.: Requirements-Led Project Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rossi, G., Schwabe, D., Lyardet, F.: Web application models are more than conceptual models. In P. Chen et al., editors, Advances in Conceptual Modeling. In: Kouloumdjian, J., Roddick, J., Chen, P.P., Embley, D.W., Liddle, S.W. (eds.) ER Workshops 1999. LNCS, vol. 1727, pp. 239–252. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B.: Conceptual modelling of web information systems. Data and Knowledge Engineering 54(2), 147–188 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B.: Personalisation of web information systems - a term rewriting approach. Data and Knowledge Engineering 62(1), 101–117 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B.: Pragmatics of storyboarding for web information systems: Usage analysis. International Journal of Web and Grid Services 3(2), 128–169 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B., Wang, Q.: Customising web information systems according to user preferences. World Wide Web 12(1), 27–50 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Webster. Webster’s ninth new collegiate dictionary (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus-Dieter Schewe
    • 1
  • Bernhard Thalheim
    • 2
  1. 1.Software Competence Center HagenbergHagenbergAustria
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceChristian-Albrechts-University KielKielGermany

Personalised recommendations