Merkle Puzzles in a Quantum World
In 1974, Ralph Merkle proposed the first unclassified scheme for secure communications over insecure channels. When legitimate communicating parties are willing to spend an amount of computational effort proportional to some parameter N, an eavesdropper cannot break into their communication without spending a time proportional to N2, which is quadratically more than the legitimate effort. We showed in an earlier paper that Merkle’s schemes are completely insecure against a quantum adversary, but that their security can be partially restored if the legitimate parties are also allowed to use quantum computation: the eavesdropper needed to spend a time proportional to N3/2 to break our earlier quantum scheme. Furthermore, all previous classical schemes could be broken completely by the onslaught of a quantum eavesdropper and we conjectured that this is unavoidable.
We give two novel key agreement schemes in the spirit of Merkle’s. The first one can be broken by a quantum adversary that makes an effort proportional to N5/3 to implement a quantum random walk in a Johnson graph reminiscent of Andris Ambainis’ quantum algorithm for the element distinctness problem. This attack is optimal up to logarithmic factors. Our second scheme is purely classical, yet it cannot be broken by a quantum eavesdropper who is only willing to expend effort proportional to that of the legitimate parties.
KeywordsMerkle Puzzles Public Key Distribution Quantum Cryptography
- 7.Brassard, G., Høyer, P., Mosca, M., Tapp, A.: Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation. In: Lomonaco Jr., S.J. (ed.) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 305, pp. 53–74. AMS, Providence (2002)Google Scholar
- 8.Brassard, G., Salvail, L.: Quantum Merkle puzzles. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Quantum, Nano, and Micro Technologies (ICQNM 2008), Sainte Luce, Martinique, pp. 76–79 (February 2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Buhrman, H., Dürr, C., Heiligman, M., Høyer, P., Magniez, F., Sántha, M., de Wolf, R.: Quantum algorithms for element distinctness (2000), http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0007016v2
- 12.Heiligman, M.: Finding matches between two databases on a quantum computer (2000), http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0006136v1
- 13.Høyer, P., Lee, T., Špalek, R.: Negative weights make adversaries stronger. In: Proceedings of 39th Annual Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 526–535 (June 2007), The complete version can be found at, http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0611054v2
- 14.Lee, T., Mittal, R., Reichardt, B.W., Špalek, R.: An adversary for algorithms (2010), http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.3020v1
- 15.Merkle, R.: C.S. 244 Project Proposal (1974), Facsimile available at http://www.merkle.com/1974