Key-Evolution Schemes Resilient to Space-Bounded Leakage

  • Stefan Dziembowski
  • Tomasz Kazana
  • Daniel Wichs
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22792-9_19

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6841)
Cite this paper as:
Dziembowski S., Kazana T., Wichs D. (2011) Key-Evolution Schemes Resilient to Space-Bounded Leakage. In: Rogaway P. (eds) Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2011. CRYPTO 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6841. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg


Much recent work in cryptography attempts to build secure schemes in the presence of side-channel leakage or leakage caused by malicious software, like computer viruses. In this setting, the adversary may obtain some additional information (beyond the control of the scheme designer) about the internal secret state of a cryptographic scheme. Here, we consider key-evolution schemes that allow a user to evolve a secret-key K1 via a deterministic function f, to get updated keys K2 = f(K1), K3 = f(K2), …. Such a scheme is leakage-resilient if an adversary that can leak on the first i steps of the evolution process does not get any useful information about any future keys. For such schemes, one must assume some restriction on the complexity of the leakage to prevent pre-computation attacks, where the leakage on a key Ki simply pre-computes a future key Ki + t and leaks even a single bit on it.

Much of the prior work on this problem, and the restrictions made therein, can be divided into two types. Theoretical work offers rigor and provable security, but at the cost of having to make strong restrictions on the type of leakage and designing complicated schemes to make standard reduction-based proof techniques go through (an example of such an assumption is the “only computation leaks” axiom). On the other hand, practical work focuses on simple and efficient schemes, often at the cost of only achieving an intuitive notion of security without formal well-specified guarantees.

In this paper, we complement the two tracks via a middle-of-the-road approach. On one hand, we rely on the random-oracle model. On the other hand, we show that even in the random-oracle model, designing secure leakage-resilient schemes is susceptible to pitfalls. For example, just assuming that leakage “cannot evaluate the random oracle” can be misleading. Instead, we define a new model in which we assume that the “leakage” can be any arbitrary space bounded computation that can make random oracle calls itself. We connect the space-complexity of a computation in the random-oracle modeling to the pebbling complexity on graphs. Using this connection, we derive meaningful guarantees for relatively simple key-evolution constructions.

Our scheme is secure also against a large and natural class of active attacks, where an attacker can leak as well as tamper with the internals of a device. This is especially important if the key evolution is performed on a PC that can be attacked by a virus, a setting considered by prior work in the bounded retrieval model (BRM)). This paper provides the first scheme were the adversary in the BRM can also modify the data stored on the machine.


graph pebbling leakage-resilient cryptography bounded-retrieval model 

Copyright information

© International Association for Cryptologic Research 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Dziembowski
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tomasz Kazana
    • 3
    • 1
  • Daniel Wichs
    • 4
  1. 1.University of WarsawPoland
  2. 2.Sapienza University of RomeItaly
  3. 3.BioInfoBank Research Institute
  4. 4.New York UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations