Evaluating the Transaction Graph through a Financial Trading Case Study

  • Ivan Launders
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6828)

Abstract

The Transaction Graph is argued as leading to a better understanding of the concepts and relations in enterprise transactions and their semantics with business rules. This design process begins with an analysis of case study narrative through the Transactional Use-Case, using a Financial Trading case study in this evaluation. The lexicon or dictionary of words and their underlying concepts are explored in order to model transactions. Peirce logic (i.e. Peirce’s visual Extential Graphs as extended by Sowa and Heaton) is then applied to the business rules to visualise the inferences in Conceptual Graphs and therefore any further possible Transaction Graph refinements. Model automation provides validation checking removing errors in semantics and syntactics. The paper demonstrates the reuse and refinement of a generic Transaction Model highlighting inference and logical operations with business rules. Additionally the paper demonstrates the reuse of the automated Transaction Model’s ontology coupled with its conceptual catalogue.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Delugach, H.S.: Information technology – Common Logic (CL) – A Framework for a Family of Logic-Based Languages (2009), http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c039175_ISO_IEC_24707_2007E.zip. (May 2, 2009)
  2. 2.
    Delugach, H.S.: CharGer: A graphical conceptual graph editor (2002), http://glotta.ntua.gr/StateoftheArt/CGs/CharGer.pdf (May 2, 2009)
  3. 3.
    Gruber, T.R.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification. Knowledge Acquisition: special issue - Current Issues in Knowledge Modelling 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geerts, G.L., McCarthy, W.E.: Database Accounting Systems. In: Williams, B.C., Spaul, B.J. (eds.) Information Technology Perspectives in Accounting: an integrated approach, pp. 159–183. Chapman & Hall, London (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heaton, J.: Goal Driven Theoreum Proving using Conceptual Graphs and Pierce Logic. PhD edn, Loughborough University (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hill, R., Polovina, S., Shadija, D.: Transaction Agent Modelling: From Experts to Concepts to Multi-Agent Systems. In: Scharfe, H., Hitzler, P., Ohrstrom, P. (eds.) ICCS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4068, pp. 247–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hill, R., Polovina, S.: An Automated Conceptual Catalogue for the Enterprise. In: Eklund, P., Haemmerlé, O. (eds.) Supplementary Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 09): Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Visualization and Reasoning, Toulouse, France. CEUR-WS, vol. 354, pp. 99–106 (July 2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kabbaj, A., Launders, I., Polovina, S.: Interoperability through standard CGIF notation: The case of Amine Platform. In: Supplementary Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kabbaj, A, About Amine Platform (2010), http://amine-platform.sourceforge.net/about.htm (March 2010)
  10. 10.
    Launders, I., Polovina, S., Hill, R.: The transaction pattern through automating TrAM. In: 17th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, Aachen, CEUR-WS (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Polovina, S., Hill, R.: A Transactions Framework for Effective Enterprise Knowledge Management. In: Akhgar, B. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th International Workshops on Conceptual Structures, pp. 221–225. Springer, London (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ross, R.G.: More on the If-Then Format for Expressing Business Rules (2011), http://www.brcommunity.com/b588.php (April 21, 2011)
  13. 13.
    Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, London (1984)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Launders
    • 1
  1. 1.BT Innovate & DesignLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations