An Introduction to Hybrid Semantics: The Role of Cognition in Semantic Resources

  • Alessandro Oltramari
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 370)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the problem of opening semantic technologies to a comprehensive cognitive modeling of information: assuming an unilateral focus on symbolic ‘representations’, in fact, spoils human knowledge processes of their peculiar ‘embodied’ features. We claim, conversely, that the mutual interlinks between static and dynamic cognitive structures should be adopted in semantic technologies to improve existing knowledge resources. In particular, in the process of ontology creation, a preliminary analysis of knowledge formation and cognitive structuring of conceptualization becomes a necessary module of semantic technologies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Albertazzi, L.: Form Aestethics: Introduction. In: Albertazzi, L. (ed.) Shapes of Form, pp. 1–17. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albertazzi, L.: Which semantics? In: Albertazzi, L. (ed.) Meaning and cognition. A multidisciplinary approach, pp. 1–24. Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albertazzi, L.: Deformazioni secondo regole. La Grammatica del vedere. Paradigmi 64 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borst, W.: Construction of Engineering Ontologies. Centre for Telematica and Information Technology. University of Tweente, Eschede (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brentano, F.: Psychologie vom Empirischen Standpunkte. Duncker & Humblot (1874)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, W., Mizoguchi, R.: Communication content ontology for learner model agent in multi-agent architecture. In: AIED 1999 Workshop on Ontologies for Educational Systems (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiari AeGV, I., Oltramari: Di cosa parliamo quando parliamo fondamentale? In: Atti del Convegno della Societ‘a di linguistica Italiana, Viterbo, Italy (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dowty, D.R., Wall, R.E., Peters, S.: Introduction to Montague Semantics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1981)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., McIntire, R.: KQML as an Agent Communication Language. In: 3rd International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 1994). ACM Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Genesereth, M., Ketchpel, S.: Software agents. Communications of ACM 7(37), 48–53 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gomez-Perez, A., Corcho, O., Fernandez-Lopez, M.: Ontological Engineering (with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web). Springer, London (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5, 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guarino, N.: Formal ontology in information systems. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of FOIS 1998, Trento, Italy, June 6-8, pp. 3–15. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guarino, N., Giaretta, P.: Ontologies and knowledge bases: towards a terminological clarification. In: Mars, N. (ed.) Towards very large knowledge bases: knowledge building and knowledge sharing. Proceedings of KBKS 1995, Enschede, pp. 25–32. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kant, I.: Critica della Capacita’ di Giudizio. Italian edn., Rizzoli (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kripke, S.: Naming and Necessity. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1980)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Langacker, R.: Why a mind is necessary? conceptualizion, grammar and linguistic semantics. In: Albertazzi, L. (ed.) Meaning and cognition. A multidiscipliary approach, pp. 25–38. Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Langacker, R.: Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, 2nd edn. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lenci, A., Calzolari, N., Zampolli, A.: From text to content: Computational lexicons and the semantic web. In: Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence; AAAI Workshop, “Semantic Web Meets Language Resources”, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marconi, D.: Filosofia e scienza cognitiva. Laterza (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Negroponte, N.: Being Digital. Alfred A. Knopf Inc. edn., New York (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neisser, U.: From direct perception to conceptual structure. In: Concepts and Conceptual development, pp. 11–24. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prevot, L., Borgo, S., Oltramari, A.: Interfacing ontologies and lexical resources. In: OntoLex (Ontologies and Lexical Resources), Jeju Island, Soth Korea (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shvaiko, P., Oltramari, A., Cuel, R., Pozza, D., Angelini, G.: Generating innovation with semantically enabled tasLab portal. In: Aroyo, L., Antoniou, G., Hyvönen, E., ten Teije, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Cabral, L., Tudorache, T. (eds.) ESWC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6088, pp. 348–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sycara, K., Paolucci, M.: Handbook on ontologies in information systems. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 343–364. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Oltramari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations