An Integrated Model of Technological and Behavioral Perspectives for Household Internet Adoption: An Empirical Study on Iranian Communities

  • Vahid Khatibi
  • Shima Mohebbi
  • Abbas Keramati
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 194)


The existing theories in the technology acceptance and Internet adoption fields could be classified to technological and behavioral approaches. In this paper, we propose an integrated household Internet adoption model combining both perspectives, so as the three primal models of technology acceptance model (TAM), theory of planned behavior (TPB) and uses and gratifications theory (U&G) are selected to construct the integrated model. The relations between the proposed model’s constructs are then hypothesized based on the literature findings, and examined in a case study of Internet adoption among Iranian household users.


Internet Adoption Technology acceptance model (TAM) Theory of planned behavior (TPB) Uses and gratifications theory (U&G) Iranian communities 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shan, A., et al.: Research of Home Information Technology Adoption Model. Homenet & Mobile Terminal 05, 10–16 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, B.: The Social Impact Of Broadband Household Internet Access. Information, Communication & Society 11(1), 5–24 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J.: Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research 27(1), 153–181 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oh, S., Ahn, J., Kim, B.: Adoption of broadband internet in Korea: the role of experience in building attitude. Journal of Information Technology 18(4), 267–280 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rogers, E.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bandura, A.: Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Venkatesh, V., et al.: User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choudrie, J., Dwivedi, Y.K.: A Comparative Study to Examine the Socio-economic Characteristics of Broadband Adopters and Non-adopters. International Journal of Services and Standards 3(3), 272–288 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Choudrie, J., Investigating, D.Y.K.: the Socio-economic Characteristics of Residential Consumers of Broadband in the UK. In: Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    López-Nicolás, C., Molina-Castillo, F.J., Bouwman, H.: An Assessment of Advanced Mobile Services Acceptance: Contributions from TAM and Diffusion Theory Models. Information & Management 45(6), 359–364 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chau, P.Y., Hu, P.J.: Information Technology Acceptance. Decision Sciences 32(4), 699–719 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harris, K.D., Donaldson, J.F., Campbell, J.D.: Introducing Computer-Based Telemedicine in the Rural Missouri Counties. Journal of End User Computing 13(4), 45–60 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science 46(2), 186–204 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taylor, S., Todd, P.A.: Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research 6(4), 144–176 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mondi, M., Woods, P., Rafi, A.: A ‘Uses and Gratification Expectancy Model’ to Predict Students’ ‘Perceived E-Learning Experience’. Educational Technology & Society 11(2), 241–261 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luo, M.M.-L., Remus, W., Chea, S.: Technology Acceptance of Internet Based Information System: An Integrated Model of TAM and U & G Theory. In: Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Acapulco, Mexico (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruggiero, T.E.: Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication & Society 3(1), 3–37 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stafford, T.F., Stafford, M.R., Schkade, L.L.: Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences 35(2), 259–288 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papacharissi, Z., Rubin, A.M.: Predictors of Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44(2), 175–196 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun, T., Zhong, B., Zhang, J.: Uses and Gratifications of Chinese Online Gamers. China Media Research 2(2), 58–63 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lin, H.-F.: Antecedents of Virtual Community Satisfaction and Loyalty: An Empirical Test of Competing Theories. Cyber Psychology and Behavior 11(2), 138–144 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zviran, M., Erlich, Z.: Measuring IS User Satisfaction: Review and Implications. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12(1), 81–103 (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Al-Omoush, K.S., Shaqrah, A.A.: An Empirical Study of Household Internet Continuance Adoption among Jordanian Users. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 10(1), 32–44 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., Chin, W.: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The influence of Perceived Resources. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 32(3), 86–112 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3), 192–222 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adamson, I., Shine, J.: Extending the New Technology Acceptance Model to Measure the End User Information Systems Satisfaction in Mandatory Environment: A Bank’s Treasury. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15(4), 441–455 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wixom, B.H., Todd, P.A.: A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance. Information System Research 16(1), 85–102 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Berk, L.E.: Development Through the Lifespan. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cooper, D.R., Schindler, P.S.: Business Research Methods. McGraw Hill, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nunnally, J.C., Bernstein, I.H.: Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brown, I., Letsididi, B., Nazeer, M.: Internet Access In South African Home: A preliminary Study on Factors Influencing Consumer Choice. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries 38(2), 1–13 (2009)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Warren, M.: Farmers Online: Drivers and Impediments in Adoption of Internet in UK Agricultural Businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11(3), 371–381 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vahid Khatibi
    • 1
  • Shima Mohebbi
    • 1
  • Abbas Keramati
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations