Advertisement

Modeling Individuals with Learning Disabilities to Personalize a Pictogram-Based Instant Messaging Service

  • Pere Tuset-Peiró
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6787)

Abstract

Individuals with learning disabilities are excluded from the information and knowledge society because information present in such media, as well as software that enables access to it, does not meet their communication and accessibility requirements. To improve this situation, we have developed and evaluated an Instant Messaging (IM) service and client based on a pictographic communication system, and with a user interface designed taking into account their accessibility requirements. But the evaluation with individuals with learning disabilities has pointed out the need to take into account the great communications and computer skills diversity, even in groups with similar disability levels. Therefore, in this paper we present our plans to model the communication and accessibility requirements of individuals with learning disabilities in order to develop a mechanism to automatically personalize the IM client user interface and adapt it to their needs.

Keywords

Learning disabilities Pictographic Communication System Instant Messaging services User modeling Interface personalization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Glinert, E., York, B.: Computers and People with Disabilities. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 1(2), 1–7 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glennen, S., DeCoste, D.: Handbook of Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poulson, D., Nicolle, C.: Making the Internet accessible for people with cognitive and communication impairments. Universal Access Information Society 3(1), 48–56 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zarin, R.: Mejla Pictogram 2.0: e-mail made easy. Technical report. Ümea Institute of Design and Swedish Institute for Special Education Needs (January 2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jennings, R., Nahum, E., Olshefski, D., Saha, D., Shae, Z., Waters, C.: A Study of Internet Instant Messaging and Chat Protocols. IEEE Network, 16–21 (July/August 2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tuset, P., Barberán, P., Janer, L., Delgado, S., Buscà, E., Vilà, N.: Messenger Visual: A pictogram-based IM service to improve communications among disabled people. In: NordiCHI 2010: 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 797–800 (October 2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fischer, G.: User Modeling in Human–Computer Interaction. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1-2), 65–86 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lepistö, A., Ovaska, S.: Usability evaluation involving participants with cognitive disabilities. In: NordiCHI 2004: 3rd Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 305–308 (October 2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chin, D.N.: Empirical Evaluation of User Models and User-Adapted Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 181–194 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pere Tuset-Peiró
    • 1
  1. 1.Secció de Projectes de Transferència, TecnoCampus Mataró-MaresmeMataróSpain

Personalised recommendations