Advertisement

Designing Trustworthy Adaptation on Public Displays

  • Ekaterina Kurdyukova
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6787)

Abstract

Adaptation on public displays brings certain advantages and risks. Due to the implicit nature of adaptation, the users often miss the causality behind the adaptive behavior. Moreover, a high degree of autonomy in adaptive displays may leave the users with the feeling of control loss. Limited amount of transparency and controllability leads to the loss of user trust. As a result, the users feel insecure, frustrated, and are likely to abandon the system. The research goal of this work is to optimize the system actions in a ubiquitous display environment, in order make adaptation design transparent, controllable, and thus trustworthy. By means of a decision-theoretic approach the user trust can be assessed in different trust-critical contexts. The contexts describe the changes in the environment that call for adaptation: privacy of content, social setting, and accuracy of knowledge. The generated decisions enable the system to maintain trust and keep interaction comfortable.

Keywords

Adaptation public displays trust 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Glass, A., McGuinness, D.L.: Wolverton. M.: Toward establishing trust in adaptive agents. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2008, pp. 227–236. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roecker, C., Hinske, S., Magerkurth, C.: Intelligent privacy support for large public displays. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction HCI International 2007, pp. 198–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graham, C., Cheverst, K.: Guides, locals, chaperones, buddies and captains: managing trust through interaction paradigms. In: 3rd Workshop ’HCI on Mobile Guides’ at the International Symposium on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 227–236. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheverst, K., Byun, H.E., Fitton, D., Sas, C., Kray, C., Villar, N.: Exploring Issues of User Model Transparency and Proactive Behaviour in an Office Environment Control System. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 15(3-4), 235–273 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellotti, V., Edwards, W.K.: Intelligibility and accountability: human considerations in context-aware systems. Human-Computer Interaction 16(2), 193–212 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lim, B.Y., Dey, A.K.: Toolkit to Support Intelligibility in Context-Aware Applications. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2010, pp. 13–22. Springer, London (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Langheinrich, M.: A Privacy Awareness System for Ubiquitous Computing Environments. In: Borriello, G., Holmquist, L.E. (eds.) UbiComp 2002. LNCS, vol. 2498, pp. 237–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurdyukova, E., André, E., Leichtenstern, K.: Trust-centered Design for Multi-Display Applications. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia, MoMM 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurdyukova, E., André, E., Leichtenstern, K.: A Decision-Theoretic Approach to maintain Trust in Ubiquitous Display Environments. International Journal of Computing 9(3), 220–227 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ekaterina Kurdyukova
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations