Coping with Poor Advice from Peers in Peer-Based Intelligent Tutoring: The Case of Avoiding Bad Annotations of Learning Objects
In this paper, we examine a challenge that arises in the application of peer-based tutoring: coping with inappropriate advice from peers. We examine an environment where students are presented with those learning objects predicted to improve their learning (on the basis of the success of previous, like-minded students) but where peers can additionally inject annotations. To avoid presenting annotations that would detract from student learning (e.g. those found confusing by other students) we integrate trust modeling, to detect over time the reputation of the annotation (as voted by previous students) and the reputability of the annotator. We empirically demonstrate, through simulation, that even when the environment is populated with a large number of poor annotations, our algorithm for directing the learning of the students is effective, confirming the value of our proposed approach for student modeling. In addition, the research introduces a valuable integration of trust modeling into educational applications.
KeywordsStudent Learning Recommender System Learning Object Trust Modeling User Modeling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.McCalla, G.: The ecological approach to the design of e-learning environments: Purpose-based capture and use of information about learners. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 7, 1–23 (2004)Google Scholar
- 2.Champaign, J., Cohen, R.: A model for content sequencing in intelligent tutoring systems based on the ecological approach and its validation through simulated students. In: Proceedings of FLAIRS-23, Daytona Beach, Florida (2010)Google Scholar
- 4.Plant, D.: hSITE: healthcare support through information technology enhancements. NSERC Strategic Research Network Proposal (2008)Google Scholar
- 8.Brooks, C.A., Panesar, R., Greer, J.E.: Awareness and collaboration in the ihelp courses content management system. In: EC-TEL, pp. 34–44 (2006)Google Scholar
- 10.Breese, J.S., Heckerman, D., Kadie, C.: Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering, pp. 43–52. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
- 13.VanLehn, K., Ohlsson, S., Nason, R.: Applications of simulated students: An exploration. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 5, 135–175 (1996)Google Scholar