Advertisement

Towards Usage-Centered Design Patterns for Social Networking Systems

  • Dina Hussein
  • Ghada Alaa
  • Ahmed Hamad
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 185)

Abstract

The role of social networks is becoming increasingly relevant in the recent years. While social networks are becoming more ubiquitous, a profound approach guiding the analysis, design and development of such social systems is becoming increasingly important. This research focuses on deriving functionalities that classify behavior of social networking applications. This led to identifying three basic/elementary usage patterns which include; interconnectivity, file sharing and tagging, while the intersection between these patterns led to other secondary/supportive usage patterns which include content authoring, content remixing, content aggregation & syndication and content streaming. By interlinking the proposed patterns of usage with underlying techniques and Web 2.0 tools we aim to provide insight into re-usable elementary building blocks common to any type of social networks. As a result a usage-centered roadmap is presented that identifies the intersection of several Web 2.0 tools and techniques used to realize the three identified social networking patterns of usage.

Keywords

Design Pattern User Profile Usage Pattern File Sharing Content Authoring 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Oreilly, T.: What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Communications & Strategies  (1), 17 (first quarter 2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kroski, E.: The social tools of Web 2.0: opportunities for academic libraries. Choice 44(12), 11–21 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Franklin, T., Harmelen, M.: Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Franklin Consulting and Mark van Harmelen (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barsky, E., Purdon, M.: Introducing Web 2.0: social networking and social bookmarking for health librarians. J. Can Health Libr. Assoc. 27, 65–67 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boulos, M., Wheeler, S.: The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal 24, 2–23 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Messinger, P.R., Stroulia, E., Lyons, K., Bone, M., Niu, R.H., Smirnov, K., Perelgut, S.: Virtual worlds - past, present, and future: New directions in social computing. Decis. Support Syst. 47(3), 204–228 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyd, D.M., Ellison, N.B.: Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1), article 11 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hussein, D., Alaa, G., Hamad, A.: Web 2.0 Based service-Oriented E-learning systems: Recurrent Design and Architectural Patterns. In: Proceedings of 11th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD 2010), June 9-11, pp. 227–232. The University of Greenwich,Article 11, London, United Kingdom (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Measurement and Analysis of Online Social Networks IMC 2007, October 24-26, San Diego, California, USA. Copyright, ACM 978-1-59593-908-1/07/0010 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pata, K., Valjataga, T.: Collaborating across national and institutional boundaries in higher education – the decentralized iCamp approach. In: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 353–362 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neumann, M., O’Murchu, I., Breslin, J., Decker, S., Hogan, D., Macdonaill, C.: Semantic social network portal for collaborative online communities. Journal of European Industrial Training 29, 472–487 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, X., Guo, L., Zhao, Y.E.: Tag-based social interest discovery. In: WWW (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lerman, K.: Social networks and social information filtering on digg. Submitted to International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lerman, K., Jones, L.: Social browsing on Flickr. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Boulder, Co, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chowdhury, S., Landoni., M.: News aggregator services: user expectations and experience, vol. 30 (2), pp. 100–115. Emerald Group Publishing (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raunik, A.: An investigation of streaming - webcasting and webconferencing technologies in the US and UK. VALA Travel Scholar (2004), http://www.valaconf.org.au/vala2006/papers2006/100_Raunik_Final.pdf
  17. 17.
    Sharp, D.: Smart Internet 2010—Social Networks. Melbourne, Australia: Swinburne University of Technology/Smart Internet Technology CRC Pty Ltd (March 2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kear, K.: Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education. Open Learning 19, 151–164 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (September 30, 2005),http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228 (accessed January 29, 2011)
  20. 20.
    McAfee, A.: Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review  47 (3) (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Buschmann, F., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Sommerlad, P., Stal, M.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koch, N.: Modelling Service-Oriented Systems with UML4SOA. In: 3rd SENSORIA Summer School (SENSUS 2009), Keszthely, Hungary (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mathes, A.: Folksonomies: cooperative classification and communication through metadata (2004), http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediatedcommunication/folksonomies.pdf (accessed January 29, 2011)
  24. 24.
    Gruber, T.: Ontology of folksonomy: a mashup of apples and oranges. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 3(1), 1–11 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Godwin-Jones, R.: Tag clouds in the blogosphere: electronic literacy and social networking. Language Learning and Technology 10(2), 8–15 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cosh, K., Burns, R., et al.: Content Clouds: Classifying Content in Web 2.0 Library, vol. 57(9), pp. 722–729. Emerald Group Publishing (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chawner, B.: Spectators, no players: information managers” use of Web 2.0 in New Zealand, vol. 26(5), pp. 630–649. Emerald Group Publishing (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ganesh, J., Padmanabhuni, S.: Web 2.0: Conceptual Framework and Research Directions. In: AMCIS 2007 Proceedings (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anderson, P.: What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch (February 2007), http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
  30. 30.
    Chowdhury, S., Landoni., M.: News aggregator services: user expectations and experience, vol. 30(2), pp. 100–115. Emerald Group Publishing (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dina Hussein
    • 1
  • Ghada Alaa
    • 1
  • Ahmed Hamad
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Informatics & Computer ScienceThe British University in Egypt (BUE)El Sherouk CityEgypt

Personalised recommendations