Advertisement

Gravitational Force: Triggered Stress in Cells of the Immune System

Chapter

Abstract

Sensitivity of the human immune system to microgravity has been supposed since the first Apollo missions and was demonstrated during several space missions in the past. In vitro experiments demonstrated that cells of the immune system are exceptionally sensitive to microgravity. Therefore, serious concerns arose whether spaceflight-associated immune system weakening ultimately precludes the expansion of human presence beyond Earth’s orbit. In human cells, gravitational forces may be sensed by an individual cell in the context of altered extracellular matrix mechanics, cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, or internal prestress in the cell–tissue matrix. The development of cellular mechanosensitivity and signal transduction was probably an evolutionary requirement to enable our cells to sense their individual microenvironment. Therefore it is possible that the same mechanisms, which enable human cells to sense and to cope with mechanical stress, are potentially dangerous in microgravity.

Keywords

International Space Station Simulated Microgravity Parabolic Flight Actin Network Simulated Weightlessness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge the support by the German Aerospace Center (DLR), Space Agency (grant no. 50WB0613 and no. 50WB0912) and ESA (ESTEC Contract nr 20562/07/NL/VJ ESA-CORA-GBF-2005-005). We also gratefully thank our collaboration ­partners DLR, ESA, EADS Astrium Space Transportation, NOVESPACE, the Swiss Air Force and the Deutsche Lufthansa.

References

  1. Albrecht-Buehler G (1991) Possible mechanisms of indirect gravity sensing by cells. ASGSB Bull 4:25–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakos A, Varkonyi A, Minarovits J, Batkai L (2001) Effect of simulated microgravity on human lymphocytes. J Gravit Physiol 8:69–70Google Scholar
  3. Bershadsky A, Kozlov M, Geiger B (2006) Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:472–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boonyaratanakornkit JB, Cogoli A, Li CF, Schopper T, Pippia P, Galleri G, Meloni MA, Hughes-Fulford M (2005) Key gravity-sensitive signaling pathways drive T cell activation. FASEB J 19:2020–2022PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Braeucker R, Cogoli A, Hemmersbach R (2002) Graviperception and graviresponse at the cellular level. In: Horneck G, Baumstark-Khan C (eds) Astrobiology the quest for the conditions of life. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 287–333Google Scholar
  6. Buravkova LB, Rykova MP, Grigorieva V, Antropova EN (2004) Cell interactions in microgravity: cytotoxic effects of natural killer cells in vitro. J Gravit Physiol 11:177–180Google Scholar
  7. Buravkova L, Romanov Y, Rykova M, Grigorieva O, Merzlikina N (2005) Cell-to-cell interactions in changed gravity: ground-based and flight experiments. Acta Astronaut 57:67–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burridge K, Wennerberg K (2004) Rho and Rac take center stage. Cell 116:167–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Choquet D, Felsenfeld DP, Sheetz MP (1997) Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin–cytoskeleton linkages. Cell 88:39–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cogoli A (1993) The effect of hypogravity and hypergravity on cells of the immune system. J Leukoc Biol 54:259–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cogoli A (1996) Gravitational physiology of human immune cells: a review of in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro studies. J Gravit Physiol 3:1–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cogoli A, Cogoli-Greuter M (1997) Activation and proliferation of lymphocytes and other mammalian cells in microgravity. Adv Space Biol Med 6:33–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cogoli A, Tschopp A, Fuchs-Bislin P (1984) Cell sensitivity to gravity. Science 225:228–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cogoli M, Bechler B, Cogoli A, Arena N, Barni S, Pippia P, Sechi G, Valora N, Monti R (1992) Lymphocytes on sounding rockets. Adv Space Res 12:141–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cogoli-Greuter M, Meloni MA, Sciola L, Spano A, Pippia P, Monaco G, Cogoli A (1996) Movements and interactions of leukocytes in microgravity. J Biotechnol 47:279–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohrs RJ, Mehta SK, Schmid DS, Gilden DH, Pierson DL (2008) Asymptomatic reactivation and shed of infectious varicella zoster virus in astronauts. J Med Virol 80:1116–1122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cubano LA, Lewis ML (2000) Fas/APO-1 protein is increased in spaceflown lymphocytes (Jurkat). Exp Gerontol 35:389–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310:1139–1143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677–689PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldner JC, Brandt BH (2002) Cancer cell motility–on the road from c-erbB-2 receptor steered signaling to actin reorganization. Exp Cell Res 272:93–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fenchel T, Finlay BJ (1986) The structure and function of Müller vesicles in loxodid ciliates. J Protozool 33:69–76Google Scholar
  22. Fuller B (1961) Tensegrity. Portfolio Artnews Annu 4:112–127Google Scholar
  23. Furuike S, Ito T, Yamazaki M (2001) Mechanical unfolding of single filamin A (ABP-280) molecules detected by atomic force microscopy. FEBS Lett 498:72–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Galimberti M, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Favillini R, Mercatelli R, Annunziato F, Cosmi L, Liotta F, Santarlasci V, Maggi E, Pavone FS (2006) Hypergravity speeds up the development of T-lymphocyte motility. Eur Biophys J 35:393–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Guéguinou N, Huin-Schohn C, Bascove M, Bueb JL, Tschirhart E, Legrand-Frossi C, Frippiat JP (2009) Could spaceflight-associated immune system weakening preclude the expansion of human presence beyond earth’s orbit? J Leukoc Biol 86:1027–1038PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Haeder D-P, Rosum A, Schaefer J, Hemmersbach R (1996) Graviperception in the flagellate Euglena gracilis during a shuttle spaceflight. J Biotechnol 47:261–269Google Scholar
  27. Haeder D-P, Porst M, Tahedl H, Richter P, Lebert M (1997) Gravitactic orientation in the flagellate Euglena gracilis. Microgravity Sci Technol 10:53–57Google Scholar
  28. Haeder D-P, Hemmersbach R, Lebert M (2005) Gravity and the behaviour of unicellular organisms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Hashemi BB, Penkala JE, Vens C, Huls H, Cubbage M, Sams CF (1999) T cell activation responses are differentially regulated during clinorotation and in spaceflight. FASEB J 13:2071–2082PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hatton JP, Gaubert F, Cazenave JP, Schmitt D (2002) Microgravity modifies protein kinase C isoform translocation in the human monocytic cell line U937 and human peripheral blood T-cells. J Cell Biochem 87:39–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Haut Donahue TL, Genetos DC, Jacobs CR, Donahue HJ, Yellowley CE (2004) Annexin V disruption impairs mechanically induced calcium signaling in osteoblastic cells. Bone 35:656–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hawkins W, Zieglschmid J (1975) Clinical aspects of crew health. In: Johnston R, Dietlein L, Berry C (eds) Biomedical results of Apollo. NASA, Washington, DC, pp 43–81Google Scholar
  33. Hemmersbach R, Braeucker R (2002) Gravity-related behaviour in ciliates and flagellates. In: Cogoli A (ed) Cell biology and biotechnology in space, advances in space biology and medicine 8. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 59–75Google Scholar
  34. Hemmersbach R, Haeder D-P (1999) Graviresponses of certain ciliates and flagellates. FASEB J 13:S69–S75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hemmersbach R, Voormanns R, Briegleb W, Rieder N, Haeder D-P (1996) Influence of accelerations on the spatial orientation of Loxodes and Paramecium. J Biotechnol 47:271–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hemmersbach R, Voormanns R, Bromeis B, Schmidt N, Rabien H, Ivanova K (1998) Comparative studies of the graviresponses of Paramecium and Loxodes. Adv Space Res 21:1285–1289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hemmersbach R, Volkmann D, Haeder D-P (1999) Graviorientation in protists and plants. J Plant Physiol 154:1–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hemmersbach-Krause R, Briegleb W, Haeder DP, Vogel K, Grothe D, Meyer I (1993) Orientation of Paramecium under the conditions of microgravity. J Eukaryot Microbiol 40:439–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoffman BD, Crocker JC (2009) Cell mechanics: dissecting the physical responses of cells to force. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 11:259–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoffman BD, Massiera G, Crocker JC (2007) Fragility and mechanosensing in a thermalized cytoskeleton model with forced protein unfolding. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 76:051906Google Scholar
  41. Hofman P, d’Andrea L, Guzman E, Selva E, Le Negrate G, Far DF, Lemichez E, Boquet P, Rossi B (1999) Neutrophil F-actin and myosin but not microtubules functionally regulate transepithelial migration induced by interleukin 8 across a cultured intestinal epithelial monolayer. Eur Cytokine Netw 10:227–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Horwitz AR, Parsons JT (1999) Cell migration–movin’ on. Science 286:1102–1103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hughes-Fulford M (2003) Function of the cytoskeleton in gravisensing during spaceflight. Adv Space Res 32:1585–1593PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hughes-Fulford M, Chang T, Li CF (2008) Effect of gravity on monocyte differentiation. Paper presented at the 10th ESA Life Sciences Symposium/29th Annual ISGP Meeting/24th Annual ASGSB Meeting/ELGRA Symposium “Life in Space for Life on Earth”, 22–27 June 2008 Angers, FranceGoogle Scholar
  45. Ingber DE (1993) Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 104:613–627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ingber D (1999) How cells (might) sense microgravity. FASEB J 13:S3–S15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ingber DE (2003a) Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction. Ann Med 35:564–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ingber DE (2003b) Tensegrity I: cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci 116:1157–1173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Jiang G, Huang AH, Cai Y, Tanase M, Sheetz MP (2006) Rigidity sensing at the leading edge through avb3 integrins and RPTPa. Biophys J 90:1804–1809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaur I, Simons ER, Castro VA, Ott CM, Pierson DL (2004) Changes in neutrophil functions in astronauts. Brain Behav Immun 18:443–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kaur I, Simons ER, Castro VA, Ott CM, Pierson DL (2005) Changes in monocyte functions of astronauts. Brain Behav Immun 19:547–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kimzey SL (1977) Hematology and immunology studies. In: Johnson RS, Dietlein LF, eds. Biomedical results from Skylab, NASA SP-377. Scientific and Technical Information Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Washington, DC, pp 249–282Google Scholar
  53. Klopp E, Graff D, Struckmeier J, Born M, Curtze S, Hofmann M, Jones D (2002) The osteoblast mechano-receptor, microgravity perception and thermodynamics. J Gravit Physiol 9:269–270Google Scholar
  54. Kole TP, Tseng Y, Huang L, Katz JL, Wirtz D (2004) Rho kinase regulates the intracellular micromechanical response of adherent cells to rho activation. Mol Biol Cell 15:3475–3484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Kondrachuk AV, Sirenko SP (1996) The theoretical consideration of microgravity effects on a cell. Adv Space Res 17:165–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Konstantinova IV, Antropova YN, Legenkov VI, Zazhirey VD (1973) Study of reactivity of blood lymphoid cells in crew members of the Soyuz-6, Soyuz-7 and Soyuz-8 spaceships before and after flight. Space Biol Med 7:48–55Google Scholar
  57. Kossmehl P, Shakibaei M, Cogoli A, Pickenhahn H, Paul M, Grimm D (2002) Simulated microgravity induces programmed cell death in human thyroid carcinoma cells. J Gravit Physiol 9:P295–P296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Langenbach KJ, Sottile J (1999) Identification of protein-disulfide isomerase activity in fibronectin. J Biol Chem 274:7032–7038PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF (1996) Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84:359–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lebert M, Haeder D-P (1996) How Euglena tells up from down. Nature 379:590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Lebert M, Richter P, Haeder DP (1997) Signal perception and transduction of gravitaxis in the flagellate Euglena gracilis. J Plant Physiol 150:685–690Google Scholar
  62. Lee JS, Gotlieb AI (2002) Microtubule-actin interactions may regulate endothelial integrity and repair. Cardiovasc Pathol 11:135–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. LeMasurier M, Gillespie PG (2005) Hair-cell mechanotransduction and cochlear amplification. Neuron 48:403–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Lewis ML, Reynolds JL, Cubano LA, Hatton JP, Lawless BD, Piepmeier EH (1998) Spaceflight alters microtubules and increases apoptosis in human lymphocytes (Jurkat). FASEB J 12:1007–1018PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Machemer H, Machemer-Roehnisch S, Braeucker R, Takahashi K (1991) Gravikinesis in paramecium: theory and isolation of a physiological response to the natural gravity vector. J Comp Physiol A 168:1–12Google Scholar
  66. Mammoto A, Huang S, Ingber DE (2007) Filamin links cell shape and cytoskeletal structure to Rho regulation by controlling accumulation of p190RhoGAP in lipid rafts. J Cell Sci 120:456–467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Martinac B (2004) Mechanosensitive ion channels: molecules of mechanotransduction. J Cell Sci 117:2449–2460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Mehta SK, Cohrs RJ, Forghani B, Zerbe G, Gilden DH, Pierson DL (2004) Stress-induced subclinical reactivation of varicella zoster virus in astronauts. J Med Virol 72:174–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Meloni MA, Galleri G, Pippia P, Cogoli-Greuter M (2006) Cytoskeleton changes and impaired motility of monocytes at modelled low gravity. Protoplasma 229:243–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Meloni MA, Galleri G, Pani G, Saba A, Pippia P, Cogoli-Greuter M (2008) Effects of real microgravity aboard international space station on monocytes motility and interaction with T-lymphocytes. Paper presented at the 10th ESA Life Sciences Symposium/29th Annual ISGP Meeting/24th Annual ASGSB Meeting/ELGRA Symposium “Life in Space for Life on Earth”, 22–27 June 2008 Angers, FranceGoogle Scholar
  71. Mossman KD, Campi G, Groves JT, Dustin ML (2005) Altered TCR signaling from geometrically repatterned immunological synapses. Science 310:1191–1193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Nakamura H, Kumei Y, Morita S, Shimokawa H, Ohya K, Shinomiya K (2003) Antagonism between apoptotic (Bax/Bcl-2) and anti-apoptotic (IAP) signals in human osteoblastic cells under vector-averaged gravity condition. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1010:143–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Niggli V (2003) Microtubule-disruption-induced and chemotactic-peptide-induced migration of human neutrophils: implications for differential sets of signalling pathways. J Cell Sci 116:813–822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Ohnishi T, Takahashi A, Wang X, Ohnishi K, Ohira Y, Nagaoka S (1999) Accumulation of a tumor suppressor p53 protein in rat muscle during a space flight. Mutat Res 430:271–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Ohta Y, Hartwig JH, Stossel TP (2006) FilGAP, a Rho- and ROCK-regulated GAP for Rac binds filamin A to control actin remodelling. Nat Cell Biol 8:803–814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Orr AW, Helmke BP, Blackman BR, Schwartz MA (2006) Mechanisms of mechanotransduction. Dev Cell 10:11–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Otey CA, Carpen O (2004) Alpha-actinin revisited: a fresh look at an old player. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 58:104–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Paulsen K, Thiel C, Timm J, Schmidt PM, Huber K, Tauber S, Hemmersbach R, Seibt D, Kroll H, Grote KH, Zipp F, Schneider-Stock R, Cogoli A, Hilliger A, Engelmann F, Ullrich O (2010) Microgravity-induced alterations in signal transduction in cells of the immune system. Acta Astronaut 67(9–10):1116–1125Google Scholar
  79. Pellis NR, Goodwin TJ, Risin D, McIntyre BW, Pizzini RP, Cooper D, Baker TL, Spaulding GF (1997) Changes in gravity inhibit lymphocyte locomotion through type I collagen. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 33:398–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Penard E (1917) Le genre Loxodes. Rev Suisse Zool 25:453–489Google Scholar
  81. Planel H (2004) Space and life: an introduction to space biology and medicine. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  82. Planel H, Richoilley G, Tixador R, Templier J, Bes JC, Gasset G (1981) Space flight effects on Paramecium tetraurelia flown aboard Salyut 6 in the Cytos 1 and Cytos M experiment. Adv Space Res 1:95–101Google Scholar
  83. Planel H, Tixador R, Nefedov Y, Gretchko G, Richoilley G (1982) Effect of space flight factors at the cellular level: results of the CYTOS experiment. Aviat Space Environ Med 53:370–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Plett PA, Abonour R, Frankovitz SM, Orschell CM (2004) Impact of modeled microgravity on migration, differentiation, and cell cycle control of primitive human hematopoietic progenitor cells. Exp Hematol 32:773–781PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Rieder N (1977) Die Müllerschen Körperchen von Loxodes magnus (Ciliata, Holotricha): Ihr Bau und ihre mögliche Funktion als Schwererezeptor. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 70. Jahresversammlung, Erlangen, Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 254Google Scholar
  86. Rief M, Pascual J, Saraste M, Gaub HE (1999) Single molecule force spectroscopy of spectrin repeats: low unfolding forces in helix bundles. J Mol Biol 286:553–561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Roesner H, Wassermann T, Moeller W, Hanke W (2006) Effects of altered gravity on the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton of human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Protoplasma 229:225–234Google Scholar
  88. Romanov YA, Buravkova LB, Rikova MP, Antropova EN, Savchenko NN, Kabaeva NV (2001) Expression of cell adhesion molecules and lymphocyte-endothelium interaction under simulated hypogravity in vitro. J Gravit Physiol 8:5–8Google Scholar
  89. Schatten H, Lewis ML, Chakrabarti A (2001) Spaceflight and clinorotation cause cytoskeleton and mitochondria changes and increases in apoptosis in cultured cells. Acta Astronaut 49:399–418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Schmitt DA, Hatton JP, Emond C, Chaput D, Paris H, Levade T, Cazenave JP, Schaffar L (1996) The distribution of protein kinase C in human leukocytes is altered in microgravity. FASEB J 10:1627–1634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Schnepel J, Tschesche H (2000) The proteolytic activity of the recombinant cryptic human fibronectin type IV collagenase from E. coli expression. J Protein Chem 19:685–692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Schwarzenberg M, Pippia P, Meloni MA, Cossu G, Cogoli-Greuter M, Cogoli A (1999) Signal transduction in T lymphocytes–a comparison of the data from space, the free fall machine and the random positioning machine. Adv Space Res 24:793–800PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Sciola L, Cogoli-Greuter M, Cogoli A, Spano A, Pippia P (1999) Influence of microgravity on mitogen binding and cytoskeleton in Jurkat cells. Adv Space Res 24:801–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Sheetz MP (2001) Cell control by membrane–cytoskeleton adhesion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:392–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Shyy JY, Chien S (2002) Role of integrins in endothelial mechanosensing of shear stress. Circ Res 91:769–775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Singh KP, Kumari R, Dumond JW (2010) Simulated microgravity-induced epigenetic changes in human lymphocytes. J Cell Biochem 111(1):123–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Spisni E, Toni M, Strillacci A, Galleri G, Santi S, Griffoni C, Tomasi V (2006) Caveolae and caveolae constituents in mechanosensing: effect of modeled microgravity on cultured human endothelial cells. Cell Biochem Biophys 46:155–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Stamenovic D, Mijailovich SM, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Chen J, Wang N (2002) Cell prestress. II: contribution of microtubules. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282:C617–C624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Stossel TP, Condeelis J, Cooley L, Hartwig JH, Noegel A, Schleicher M, Shapiro SS (2001) Filamins as integrators of cell mechanics and signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:138–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Stowe RP, Sams CF, Mehta SK, Kaur I, Jones ML, Feeback DL, Pierson DL (1999) Leukocyte subsets and neutrophil function after short-term spaceflight. J Leukoc Biol 65:179–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Streb C, Richter P, Ntefidou M, Lebert M, Haeder DP (2002) Sensory transduction of gravitaxis in Euglena gracilis. J Plant Physiol 159:855–862Google Scholar
  102. Studer M, Thiel C, Bradacs G, Engelmann F, Engeli S, Huerlimann E, Zeitner P, Ullrich O (2010) Parabolic maneuvers of the Swiss Air Force fighter jet Northrop F5-E as a new platform to identify rapid gravi-responsive mechanisms in cultured mammalian cells. Paper presented at the 61st International Astronautical Congress, IAC-10. A1.7.9, 27 Sep–01Oct 2010, Prague Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  103. Sundaresan A, Risin D, Pellis NR (2002) Loss of signal transduction and inhibition of lymphocyte locomotion in a ground-based model of microgravity. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 38:118–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Tairbekov MG (1996) The role of signal systems in cell gravisensitivity. Adv Space Res 17:113–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Tamada M, Sheetz MP, Sawada Y (2004) Activation of a signaling cascade by cytoskeleton stretch. Dev Cell 7:709–718PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Tzima E, Irani-Tehrani M, Kiosses WB, Dejana E, Schultz DA, Engelhardt B, Cao G, DeLisser H, Schwartz MA (2005) A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature 437:426–431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Uva BM, Masini MA, Sturla M, Tagliafierro G, Strollo F (2002a) Microgravity-induced programmed cell death in astrocytes. J Gravit Physiol 9:P275–P276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Uva BM, Masini MA, Sturla M, Prato P, Passalacqua M, Giuliani M, Tagliafierro G, Strollo F (2002b) Clinorotation-induced weightlessness influences the cytoskeleton of glial cells in culture. Brain Res 934:132–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Uva BM, Strollo F, Ricci F, Pastorino M, Mason JI, Masini MA (2005) Morpho-functional alterations in testicular and nervous cells submitted to modelled microgravity. J Endocrinol Invest 28:84–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Verschueren H, van der Taelen I, Dewit J, De Braekeleer J, De Baetselier P, Aktories K, Just I (1995) Effects of Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin and cytochalasin D on in vitro invasiveness, motility and F-actin content of a murine T-lymphoma cell line. Eur J Cell Biol 66:335–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Vogel V, Sheetz M (2006) Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Walther I, Pippia P, Meloni MA, Turrini F, Mannu F, Cogoli A (1998) Simulated microgravity inhibits the genetic expression of interleukin-2 and its receptor in mitogen-activated T lymphocytes. FEBS Lett 436:115–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Wang N, Stamenovic D (2000) Contribution of intermediate filaments to cell stiffness, stiffening, and growth. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 279:C188–C194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Wang N, Naruse K, Stamenović D, Fredberg JJ, Mijailovich SM, Tolić-Nørrelykke IM, Polte T, Mannix R, Ingber DE (2001) Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:7765–7770PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Wang N, Tolić-Nørrelykke IM, Chen J, Mijailovich SM, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ, Stamenović D (2002) Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282:C606–C616PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Wang Y, Botvinick EL, Zhao Y, Berns MW, Usami S, Tsien RY, Chien S (2005) Visualizing the mechanical activation of Src. Nature 434:1040–1045PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Machine Design, Engineering Design and Product Development, Institute of Mechanical EngineeringOtto-von-Guericke-University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Medical Physics and BiophysicsUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations