Advertisement

Airborne Radiometric Surveying for the Management of Health, Safety and the Environment in the Uranium Mining Industry: Potential Applications and Limitations

  • Henk Coetzee
  • James Larkin
Part of the Springer Geology book series (SPRINGERGEOL)

Abstract

Some requirements for radiological site assessment may be at least partially fulfilled using airborne radiometric surveys. These include the identification of contaminated areas and the quantification and characterization of radionuclide contamination, as well as the identification of pollution resulting from human activities. Surveys flown over areas contaminated by mining and other activities demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of airborne surveying. Applications include the identification and mapping of contamination throughout the life-cycle of a mine.

Keywords

Decay Series Anthropogenic Radionuclide Airborne Surveying Radiometric Survey 232Th Decay Series 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chevrel, S. and H. Coetzee (1997) An example of GIS use in surface and ground-water pollution sensitivity analysis: Regional impact of mining activities in South Africa. CMWR 97 (Fourth international conference on Computer Methods and Water Resources), Byblos, Lebanon.Google Scholar
  2. Coetzee, H. and H. Szczesniak (1993) Detection and monitoring of pollution from mine tailings dams along rivers in the Witwatersrand gold fields using the airborne radiometric method. 16th Int. Colloquium on African Geology. Ezulwinini Valley, Swaziland.Google Scholar
  3. Coetzee, H., E.H. Stettler, T.A. Grace, P.J. Kulper and M.E. Hauger (1998) Development of a lightweight high-resolution airborne geophysical system. 4th Technical Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Society (European Section), Barcelona, Spain, September 14–17, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. Coetzee, H., S. Chevrel and F. Cottard (2002) Inter-disciplinary studies of the impact of gold and uranium mining in the Witwatersrand Goldfield. Uranium in the aquatic environment, proceedings of Uranium mining and hydrogeology III, Freiberg, Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coetzee, H., F. Winde and P. Wade (2006) An assessment of sources, pathways, mechanisms and risks of current and future pollution of water and sediments in the Wonderfonteinspruit Catchment. Pretoria, Water Research Commission: 202 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Coetzee, H. (2008) Acquisition, processing and enhancement of multi-channel radiometric data collected with ultralight aircraft mounted detectors. School of Geosciences. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. PhD: 357 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, J.C. (1952) An analysis of airborne surveying for surface radioactivity. Geophysics 17(4): 687–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickson, B. and G. Taylor (1998) Noise Reduction of aerial gamma-ray surveys. Exploration Geophysics 29: 324–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duval, J.S.J., J.M. Worden, R.B. Clark and J.A.S. Adams (1972) Experimental Comparison of NaI(Tl) and Solid Organic Scintillation Detectors for Use in Remote Sensing of Terrestrial Gamma-Rays. Geophysics 37(5): 879–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duval, J.S. (1983) Composite Color Images of Aerial Gamma-Ray Spectrometric Data. Geophysics 48(6): 722–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grasty, R.L. (1975) Uranium Measurement by Airborne Gamma-Ray Spectrometry. Geophysics 40(3): 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hovgaard, J. (1997) A new processing technique for airborne gamma-ray spectrometer data (Noise adjusted singular value decomposition). Am Nucl. Soc. Sixth topical meeting on Emergency Preparedness and Response, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  13. Hovgaard, J. and R.L. Grasty (1997) Reducing statistical noise in airborne gamma-ray data through spectral component analysis. Proceedings of Exploration 97: Fourth Decennial Conference on Mineral Exploration, Toronto.Google Scholar
  14. International Atomic Energy Agency (2003) Guidelines for radioelement mapping using gamma ray spectrometry. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency: 173 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Koomans, R.L., J. Limburg, and E.R.v.d. Graaf. Towards lightweight airborne gamma spectrometry: A case study. 2008 (cited 2008 30 May 2008); Available from: http://www.medusa-online.com/files/systemen/05_TowardsLightweightAirborneGamma.pdf.Google Scholar
  16. Larkin, J. (2011) Comparative Investigation of Airborne and Ground-based Radiometric Survey Techniques. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. MSc: 132 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Mariscotti, M.A. (1967) A method for automatic identification of peaks in the presence of background and its application to spectrum analysis. Nuclear Instruments and Methods 50: 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moxham, R.M. (1960) Airborne radioactivity surveys in geologic exploration. Geophysics 25(2): 408–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pitkin, J.A. and J.S. Duval (1980) Design Parameters for Aerial Gamma-Ray Surveys Geophysics 45(9): 1427–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rawlins, B.G., C. Scheib, A.N. Tyler, D. Jones, R. Webster and M.E. Young (2009) The spatial distribution of caesium-137 over Northern Ireland from fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol 11, EGU2009-2471.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, A.Y. and M. Tauchid (1989) Uranium exploration and technology: Preserving the “know-how”. IAEA Bulletin 1989(1): 16–19.Google Scholar
  22. Stettler, E.H., M.E. Hauger, H. Coetzee, T. Grace, R.J.D. Meijer, J. Limburg, P.J. Kulper and P. Cole (1997) Recent magnetometer and spectrometer experiments using an airborne microlight platform. 4th Technical Meeting, South African Geophysical Association, Swakopmund, Namibia, 29–30 September, 1997.Google Scholar
  23. van Tonder, D.M., H. Coetzee, L.K.C. Strachan, T. Mafanya, P.W. Wade, N. Msezane, M.G. Kwata, M. Roos, D. Sebake, H. Mengistu, B. Yibas, and S. Esterhuyse (2008) Regional gold mining closure strategy for the Witwatersrand Basin: Department of Minerals and Energy, Pretoria, Council for Geoscience Report No. 2008-0179, pp. 140.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henk Coetzee
    • 1
    • 2
  • James Larkin
    • 3
  1. 1.Council for GeosciencePretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.School of GeosciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.Radiation and Health Physics UnitUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations