Persona-Storyboard Fusion: A Hybrid Approach to Improving Design Artifacts
We propose and explore a novel method for fusing personas and storyboards in iteration by novice and expert designers. Personas have been shown to provide benefits to designers in understanding their users and keeping them in mind while designing. Storyboards have been shown to facilitate the communication of process between designers and users, and between designers and developers. Our process demonstrates the power and limitations of personas and storyboards, seeking to improve the design artifacts’ ability to inform the analysis of a product, and the resulting design implications. We describe the application of our process in a product design exercise. Through our study we saw the fusion of personas and storyboards facilitate the teaching of design.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Cooper, A.: The inmates are running the asylum. Sams, USA (1995)Google Scholar
- 2.Van der Lelie, C.: The value of storyboards in the product design process. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 159–162 (2006)Google Scholar
- 3.Blomquist, Å., Arvola, M.: Personas in action: Ethnography in an interaction design team. In: Conference Personas in action: Ethnography in an interaction design team (2002)Google Scholar
- 4.Rowan, J., Cooper, M.: The plural self: Multiplicity in everyday life. Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks (1999)Google Scholar
- 5.Ronkko, K.: An empirical study demonstrating how different design constraints, project organization and contexts limited the utility of personas. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 220a (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.Wahid, S., McCrickard, D.S., DeGol, J., Elias, N., Harrison, S.: Don’t drop it! Pick it up and storyboard. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011)Google Scholar
- 7.Nieters, J., Ivaturi, S., Ahmed, I.: Making Personas Memorable. In: Proceedings of The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1817–1824 (2007)Google Scholar