Advertisement

Transport and Equilibrium Reactions

  • Ekkehard Holzbecher
Chapter

Abstract

The situation that environmentally relevant species take part in chemical reactions, while being transported through a compartment of the environment, was already treated in Chap. 7. In this chapter the same situation is taken up again with the difference concerning the time scale of the reactions. Here we deal with reactions which are fast in comparison to transport processes.

Keywords

Mass Action Reactive Transport Equilibrium Reaction Maximum Rank Speciation Calculation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berner RA (1971) Principles of chemical sedimentology. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 240Google Scholar
  2. Debye P, Hückel E (1923) Zur Theorie der Elektrolyte. Physikalische Zeitschrift 23:185–206, in GermanGoogle Scholar
  3. Fang Y, Yeh G-T, Burgos WD (2003) A general paradigm to model reaction-based biogeochemical processes in batch systems. Water Res Res 39(4):1083. doi: 10.1029/2002WR001694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Holzbecher E (2005) Reactive transport – concepts and numerical approaches. In: Ingham DB, Pop I (eds) Transport phenomena in porous media, vol III. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 305–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Holzbecher E (2006) On the coupling of transport and chemical speciation calculations with FEMLAB. Chem Eng Technol 29(5):5–7, Supplement ‘Trends in Chemical Engineering’Google Scholar
  6. Klug M, Sanches M, Laranjeira M, Fávere V, Rodrigues C (1998) Anályse das isotermas de adsorção de Cu(II), Cd(II), Ni(II) e Zn(II) pela N-(3,4-dihidroxibenzil) quitosana empregando o método da regressão não linear. Química Nova 21(4):410–413, in PotugueseCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krauskopf KB, Bird DK (1995) Introduction to geochemistry. McGraw Hill, New York, p 647Google Scholar
  8. Parkhurst DL (1995) PHREEQC: a computer program for speciation, reaction-path, advective transport, and inverse geochemical calculations, Lakewood. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigation Report 95–4227, p 143Google Scholar
  9. Saaltink MW, Ayora C, Carrera J (1998) A mathematical formulation for reactive transport that eliminates mineral concentrations. Water Res Res 34(7):1649–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Saaltink MW, Carrera J, Ayora C (2001) On the behavior of approaches to simulate reactive transport. J Contaminant Hydrol 48:213–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sigg L, Stumm W (1989) Aquatische Chemie. vdf-Verlag, Zurich, p 498, in GermanGoogle Scholar
  12. Steefel CI, MacQuarrie KTB (1996) Approaches to modeling of reactive transport in porous media. In: Lichtner PC, Steefel CI, Oelkers EH (eds) Reactive transport in porous media, reviews in mineralogy, vol 34, Mineral. Soc.of Am., pp 83–129Google Scholar
  13. van der Lee J (1998) Thermodynamic and mathematical concepts of CHESS, Ècole des Mines de Paris. Technical Report LHM/RD/98/39, p 99Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georg-August Universität GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations