A New Programming Interface for Educational Robotics

  • Javier Caccavelli
  • Sol Pedre
  • Pablo de Cristóforis
  • Andrea Katz
  • Diego Bendersky
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 161)


Educational Robotics uses robots as a tool for teaching a variety of subjects other than specifically robotics in undergraduate curricula. To achieve this goal is vital to have an adequate interface that allows inexperienced students to interact with robots in an easy manner. In this paper we present the current development of ERBPI (Easy Robot Behaviour Programming Interface), a new application that doesn’t require any previous programming experience to control robots. To accomplish this, we propose to abandon the imperative programming paradigm and take a behaviour-based approach. Thus, the new application is based on the connectionist paradigm, accomplishing behaviours by establishing configurable connections between sensors and actuators. Moreover, different defined behaviours can be connected using a subsumption architecture. The new application is designed to work with different robots and simulators, and it is simple for adding new ones. Learning experiences with high school students allowed us to test its effectiveness.


educational robotics behaviour-based programming interface 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Blank, D.S., Kumar, D., Meeden, L., Yanco, H.: Pyro: A python-based versatile programming environment for teaching robotics. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), Special Issue on Robotics in Undergraduate Education. Part 2 4(3), 115 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baum, D.: NQC, (accessed March 17, 2011)
  3. 3.
    Markus. brickOS, (accessed March 17, 2011)
  4. 4.
    Solorzano, J.: leJOS, (accessed March 17, 2011)
  5. 5.
    Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio, (accessed March 17, 2011)
  6. 6.
    MIT’s Scheller Teacher Education Program (STEP), (accessed March 17, 2011)
  7. 7. (accessed March 17, 2011)
  8. 8. (accessed March 17, 2011)
  9. 9.
    Tufts University. RoboLab, (accessed March 17, 2011)
  10. 10.
    Azhar, M.Q.: An agent-oriented behavior-based interface framework for educationa robotics. In: Agent-Based Systems for Human Learning (ABSHL) Workshop at Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS-2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Braitenberg, V.: Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arkin, R.C.: Behavior-Based Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cormen, H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L., Stein, C.: Topological Sort, Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K-Team, Khepera I, (accessed March 17, 2011)
  15. 15.
    Pedre, S., de Cristforis, P., Caccavelli, J., Stoliar, A.: A mobile mini robot architecture for research, education and popularization of science. Journal of Applied Computer Science Methods, Guest Editors: Zurada, J., Estevez, P. 2(1), 41–59, ISSN 1689-9636.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yet Another Khepera Simulator, (accessed March 17, 2011)
  17. 17.
    Player/Stage Simulator, (accessed March 17, 2011)
  18. 18.
    ExpoUBA 2010, Plaza de las Ciencias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, (accessed March 17, 2010)
  19. 19.
    Robot programming workshop for high school students, (accessed March 17, 2011)
  20. 20.
    Robot programming workshop for high school students, (accessed March 17, 2011)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier Caccavelli
    • 1
  • Sol Pedre
    • 1
  • Pablo de Cristóforis
    • 1
  • Andrea Katz
    • 1
  • Diego Bendersky
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Computación, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations