A Framework for Integrated Software Quality Prediction Using Bayesian Nets

  • Łukasz Radliński
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6786)


The aim of this study is to develop a framework for integrated software quality prediction. This integration is reflected by a range of quality attributes incorporated in the model as well as relationships between these attributes. The model is formulated as a Bayesian net, a technique that has already been used in various software engineering studies. The framework enables to incorporate expert knowledge about the domain as well as related empirical data and encode them in the Bayesian net model. Such model may be used in decision support for software analysts and managers.


Bayesian net framework quality model quality features software quality prediction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abouelela, M., Benedicenti, L.: Bayesian Network Based XP Process Modelling. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 1, 1–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    AgenaRisk BN Tool, Agena (2009),
  3. 3.
    Akiyama, F.: An Example of Software System Debugging, In: Federation for Information Processing Congress, Ljubljana, vol. 71, pp. 353–379 (1971) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alvaro, A., Santana De Almeida, E., Romero De Lemos Meira, S.: A software component quality framework. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Not. 35, 1–18 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beaver, J.M.: A life cycle software quality model using bayesian belief networks, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida Orlando, FL (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Côté, M.-A., Suryn, W., Georgiadou, E.: In search for a widely applicable and accepted software quality model for software quality engineering. Softw. Qual. J. 15, 401–416 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fenton, N., Hearty, P., Neil, M., Radliński, Ł.: Software Project and Quality Modelling Using Bayesian Networks. In: Meziane, F., Vadera, S. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence Applications for Improved Software Engineering Development: New Prospects, pp. 1–25. Information Science Reference, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fenton, N., Marsh, W., Neil, M., Cates, P., Forey, S., Tailor, M.: Making Resource Decisions for Software Projects. In: 26th Int. Conference on Software Engineering, Washington DC, pp. 397–406 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fenton, N., Neil, M., Marsh, W., Hearty, P., Radliński, Ł., Krause, P.: On the effectiveness of early life cycle defect prediction with Bayesian Nets. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13, 499–537 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fenton, N.E., Neil, M., Caballero, J.G.: Using Ranked Nodes to Model Qualitative Judgments in Bayesian Networks. IEEE Trans Knowl. Data Eng. 19, 1420–1432 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO/IEC 25000:2005, Software Engineering – Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – Guide to SQuaRE (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO/IEC FDIS 25010:2011, Systems and software engineering – Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO/IEC FDIS 9126-1:2001, Software Engineering – Product quality – Part 1: Quality model (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO/IEC TR 9126-2:2003, Software engineering – Product quality – Part 2: External metrics (2003) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO/IEC TR 9126-3:2003, Software engineering – Product quality – Part 3: Internal metrics (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ISO/IEC TR 9126-4:2004, Software Engineering – Product quality – Part 4: Quality in use metrics (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jarvis, A., Crandall, V.: Inroads to Software Quality: “How to” Guide and Toolkit. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jensen, F.V., Nielsen, T.D.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jones, C.: Applied Software Measurement: Global Analysis of Productivity and Quality, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kan, S.H.: Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kjærulff, U.B., Madsen, A.L.: Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams. A Guide to Construction and Analysis. Springer, New York (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lyu, M.: Handbook of software reliability engineering. McGraw-Hill, Hightstown (1996)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mair, C., Kadoda, G., Lefley, M., Phalp, K., Schofield, C., Shepperd, M., Webster, S.: An investigation of machine learning based prediction systems. J. Syst. Softw. 53, 23–29 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Musa, J.D.: Software Reliability Engineering: More Reliable Software Faster and Cheaper, 2nd edn. Author house, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Regan, G.: A Practical Approach to Software Quality. Springer, New York (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ortega, M., Perez, M., Rojas, T.: Construction of a Systemic Quality Model for Evaluating a Software Product. Softw. Qual. J. 11, 219–242 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pfautz, J., Koelle, D., Carlson, E., Roth, E.: Complexities and Challenges in the Use of Bayesian Belief Networks: Informing the Design of Causal Influence Models. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd Annual Meeting, San Antonio, pp. 237–241 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Radliński, Ł., Fenton, N., Neil, M., Marquez, D.: Improved Decision-Making for Software Managers Using Bayesian Networks. In: 11th IASTED Int. Conf. Software Engineering and Applications, pp. 13–19. IASTED, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Radlinski, L., Hoffmann, W.: On Predicting Software Development Effort using Machine Learning Techniques and Local Data. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Comput. 2, 123–136 (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Radlinski, L.: A Survey of Bayesian Net Models for Software Development Effort Prediction. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Comput. 2, 95–109 (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Radliński, Ł.: BaNISoQ: Bayesian Net Model for Integrated Software Quality Prediction (2010),
  32. 32.
    Rosqvist, T., Koskela, M., Harju, H.: Software Quality Evaluation Based on Expert Judgement. Softw. Qual. J. 11, 39–55 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rubey, R.J., Hartwick, R.D.: Quantitative measurement of program quality. In: ACM National Conference, pp. 671–677. ACM, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schneidewind, N.F.: An approach to software reliability prediction and quality control. In: Proc. of the American Federation of Information Processing Societies, pp. 337–347. ACM, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schulmeyer, G.G., McManus, J.I. (eds.): Handbook of Software Quality Assurance. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van Koten, C., Gray, A.R.: An application of Bayesian network for predicting object-oriented software maintainability. Inf. Softw. Technol. 48, 59–67 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Villalba, M.T., Fernández-Sanz, L., Martínez, J.J.: Empirical support for the generation of domain-oriented quality models. IET Softw. 4, 1–14 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wagner, S.: A Bayesian network approach to assess and predict software quality using activity-based quality models. In: 5th Int. Conf. on Predictor Models in Software Engineering. ACM Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang, D., Tsai, J.J.P.: Machine Learning and Software Engineering. Softw. Qual. J. 11, 87–119 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Łukasz Radliński
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems EngineeringUniversity of SzczecinSzczecinPoland

Personalised recommendations