Urban Development Scenarios and Probability Mapping for Greater Dublin Region: The MOLAND Model Applications

  • Harutyun Shahumyan
  • Roger White
  • Laura Petrov
  • Brendan Williams
  • Sheila Convery
  • Michael Brennan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6782)

Abstract

The MOLAND land use model was used in several studies to simulate possible scenarios of future settlement patterns in the Greater Dublin Region (GDR). This paper compares the results of three different research outputs with ten possible scenarios for GDR urban development. Brief descriptions of the scenarios and probability maps combining these scenarios are presented. The suggested approach of scenario analysis can be used by planners and decision makers to get an idea of the most likely development areas in the region if several scenarios are under consideration. In addition, probability maps help to find areas where the decisions could have the most influence on development patterns with minimal efforts.

Keywords

scenario simulation model MOLAND probability maps urban development land use weighted scenario comparison Greater Dublin Region 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shearer, A.W.: Approaching scenario-based studies: three perceptions about the future and considerations for landscape planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32, 67–87 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    White, R., Straatman, G., Engelen, G.: Planning Visualization and Assessment:  A Cellular Automata Based Integrated Spatial Decision Support System. In: Goodchild, Janelle, eds (eds.) Spatially Integrated Social Science, pp. 420–442. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barredo, J., Lavalle, C., Demicheli, L., Kasanko, M., McCormick, N.: Sustainable urban and regional planning: The MOLAND activities on urban scenario modelling and forecast. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dublin & Mid East Regional Authorities: Regional Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area 2010-2022. The Regional Planning Guidelines Office (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engelen, G., Lavalle, C., Barredo, J., van der Meulen, M., White, R.: The MOLAND Modelling Framework for Urban and Regional Land use Dynamics. In: Koonen, E., Stillwell, J., Bakema, A., Scholten, H. (eds.) Modelling Land-Use Change: Progress and Applications, Netherlands, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Williams, B., Shahumyan, H., Boyle, I., Convery, S., White, R.: Adapting an Urban-Regional Model (MOLAND) for Supporting the Planning and Provision of Strategic Regional Infrastructure: Providing Wastewater Treatment Capacity in the Dublin Region 2006 – 2026, pp. 2006–2026. UCD Urban Institute Ireland Working Paper Series, Dublin, Ireland (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brennan, M., Shahumyan, H., Walsh, C., Carty, J., Williams, B., Convery, S.: Regional Planning Guideline review: using MOLAND as part of the Strategic Environmental Assessment Process. UCD Urban Institute Working Paper Series, Dublin, Ireland (2009) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petrov, L., Shahumyan, H., Williams, B., Convery, S.: Scenario development and indicators to explore the future of GDR in the context of European impact assessment. In: Submitted to the conference, Spatial Thinking and Geographic Information Sciences, Tokyo (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shahumyan H., Twumasi B., Convery S., Foley R., Vaughan E., Casey E., Carty J., Walsh C., Brennan M.: Data Preparation for the MOLAND Model Application for the Greater Dublin Region. UCD Urban Institute Ireland Working Paper Series, Dublin, Ireland (2009) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shahumyan, H., White, R., Twumasi, B., Convery, S., Williams, B., Critchley, M., Carty, J., Walsh C., Brennan M.: The MOLAND Model Calibration and Validation for Greater Dublin Region. UCD Urban Institute Ireland Working Paper Series, Dublin, Ireland (2009) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Central Statistics Office: Regional Population Projections 2011-2026. CSO, Dublin (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Convery, F., McInerney, D., Sokol, M., Stafford, P.: Organising Space in a dynamic economy - insights for policy from the Irish experience. Built Environment 32, 172–183 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dublin & Mid-East Regional Authorities: Strategic Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area. Dublin: Regional Planning Guidelines Project Office (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    EEA: Urban sprawl in Europe, The ignored challenge, EEA report No 10, ISSN 1725-9177, Copenhagen (2006) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitchell, C.A.: Making sense of counter urbanization. Journal of Rural Studies 20, 15–34 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williams, B., Hughes, B., Redmond, D.: Managing an unstable housing market, vol. 10/02. UCD Urban Institute Ireland Working Paper Series, Dublin, Ireland (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    RIKS: Map Comparison Kit User manual. RIKS, Maastricht, the Netherlands (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barredo, J., Petrov, L., Sagris, V., Lavalle, C., Genovese, E.: Towards an integrated scenario approach for spatial planning and natural hazard mitigation. European Commission, DG- Joint Research Centre, EUR 21900 EN (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    White, R.: Experimenting with the Future …Now. Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change Seminar Series. CD Earth Systems Institute, Dublin (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harutyun Shahumyan
    • 1
  • Roger White
    • 2
  • Laura Petrov
    • 1
  • Brendan Williams
    • 1
  • Sheila Convery
    • 1
  • Michael Brennan
    • 1
  1. 1.University College Dublin Urban Institute IrelandDublin 4Ireland
  2. 2.Memorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations