Making Decision Process Knowledge Explicit Using the Decision Data Model

  • Razvan Petrusel
  • Irene Vanderfeesten
  • Cristina Claudia Dolean
  • Daniel Mican
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 87)

Abstract

In this paper we present an approach for mining decisions. We show that through the use of a Decision Data Model (DDM) we can make explicit the knowledge employed in decision making. We use the DDM to provide insights into the data view of a business decision process. To support our claim we introduce our complete, functional decision mining approach. First, a ‘decision-aware system’ introduces the decision maker to a simulated environment containing all data needed for the decision. We log the user’s interaction with the system (focusing on data manipulation and aggregation). The log is mined and a DDM is created. The advantage of our approach is that, when needed to investigate a large number of subjects, it is much faster, less expensive and produces more objective results than classical knowledge acquisition methods such as interviews and questionnaires. The feasibility and usability of our approach is shown by a case study and experiments.

Keywords

Decision Mining Product Data Model Decision-aware System Decision Workflow 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Simon, H.A.: The New Science of Management Decision. Harper and Row, New York (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turban, E., Sharda, R., Delen, D.: Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems, 9th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petrusel, R., Mican, D.: Mining Decision Activity Logs. In: Abramowicz, W., Tolksdorf, R., Węcel, K. (eds.) BIS 2010 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 57, pp. 67–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vanderfeesten, I.: Product-Based Design and Support of Workflow Processes. PhD dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reijers, H.A., Limam Mansar, S., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Product-Based Workflow Design. Journal of Management Information Systems 20, 229–262 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Orlicky, J.A.: Structuring the Bill of Materials for MRP. J. Production and Inventory Management, 19–42 (1972)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.: Workflow Management: Models, Methods and Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B.F., Herbst, J., Maruster, L., Schimm, G., Weijters, A.J.M.M.: Workflow Mining: A Survey of Issues and Approaches. J. Data and Knowledge Engineering. 47, 237–267 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decision Mining in ProM. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 420–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petruşel, R., Vanderfeesten, I., Dolean, C.C., Mican, D.: Making Decision Process Knowledge Explicit Using the Product Data Model. Beta working paper series, WP 340, Technische Universiteit, Eindhoven (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Razvan Petrusel
    • 1
  • Irene Vanderfeesten
    • 2
  • Cristina Claudia Dolean
    • 1
  • Daniel Mican
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economical Sciences and Business AdministrationBabes-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania
  2. 2.School of Industrial EngineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations