Strongly Correlated Systems pp 237-270 | Cite as
Cluster Perturbation Theory
Abstract
Cluster perturbation theory (CPT) is a simple approximation scheme that applies to lattice models with local interactions, like the Hubbard model, or models where the local interaction is predominant. It proceeds by tiling the lattice into identical, finite-size clusters, solving these clusters exactly and treating the inter-cluster hopping terms at first order in strong-coupling perturbation theory. This review will focus on the kinematical aspects of CPT, in particular the periodization procedure, and on the practical implementation of CPT using an exact diagonalization solver for the cluster. Applications of CPT will be briefly reviewed.
Keywords
Green Function Spectral Function Hubbard Model Krylov Subspace Lanczos MethodNotes
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the following people for discussions which, over the years, have strengthened and widened his understanding of quantum cluster methods: M. Civelli, G. Kotliar, B. Kyung, M. Jarrell, Th. Maier, S. Okamoto, D. Plouffe, M. Potthoff, A-M. Tremblay, and C. Weber. Computational resources for this review were provided by RQCHP and Compute Canada.
References
- 1.S. Pairault, D. Sénéchal, A.M.S. Tremblay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5389 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.D. Sénéchal, D. Perez, D. Plouffe, Phys. Rev. B 66, 075129 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.C. Gros, R. Valenti, Phys. Rev. B 48, 418 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.D. Sénéchal, D. Perez, M. Pioro-Ladrière, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 522 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.S. Pairault, D. Sénéchal, A.M. Tremblay, Eur. Phys. J. B 16, 85 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.M. Potthoff, M. Aichhorn, C. Dahnken, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 206402 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.M.T. Tran, Phys. Rev. B 74(15), 155121 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.M. Aichhorn, E. Arrigoni, M. Potthoff, W. Hanke, Phys. Rev. B 74(23), 235117 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.A. Ruhe, Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide (SIAM, PA, 2000), chap. 4.1Google Scholar
- 10.E. Dagotto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66(3), 763 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.R. Freund, Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide (SIAM, PA, 2000), chap. 4.6Google Scholar
- 12.N. Laflorencie, D. Poilblanc, in Quantum Magnetism. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 645 (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 227–252Google Scholar
- 13.A. Weiße, G. Wellein, A. Alvermann, H. Fehske, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78(1), 275 (2006)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.F. Lin, E.S. Sørensen, C. Kallin, A.J. Berlinsky, Phys. Rev. B 75(7), 075112 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.F. Lin, E.S. Sørensen, C. Kallin, A.J. Berlinsky, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19(45), 456206 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.G. Li, W. Hanke, A.N. Rubtsov, S. Bäse, M. Potthoff, Phys. Rev. B 80(19), 195118 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.G. Kotliar, S. Savrasov, G. Pálsson, G. Biroli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 186401 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.M. Capone, M. Civelli, S.S. Kancharla, C. Castellani, G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 69(19), 195105 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.T.D. Stanescu, G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 74(12), 125110 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.D. Sénéchal, A.M.S. Tremblay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126401 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.N. Armitage et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 257001 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.F. Ronning et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 165101 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.E.H. Lieb, F.Y. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20(25), 1445 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.C. Dahnken, E. Arrigoni, W. Hanke, J. Low Temp. Phys. 126(3-4), 949 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.E. Arrigoni, M. Aichhorn, M. Daghofer, W. Hanke, New J. Phys. 11(5), 055066 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.S.H. ans S Kudo, T. Shirakawa, Y. Ohta, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 150, 042060 (2009)Google Scholar
- 27.W.Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 73(23), 235325 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.M. Zacher, R. Eder, E. Arrigoni, W. Hanke, Int. J. Modern Phys. B 14(29-31), 3783 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 29.M. Zacher, R. Eder, E. Arrigoni, W. Hanke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(12), 2585 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.A.S. Ovchinnikov, I.G. Bostrem, V.E. Sinitsyn, Theor. Math. Phys. 162, 179 (2010)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.F. Pollmann, G. Zwicknagl, Phys. Rev. B 73(3), 035121 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.K. Asano, T. Nishida, T. Ogawa, Phys. Status Solidi (B) 245, 2729 (2008)Google Scholar
- 33.M. Zacher, R. Eder, E. Arrigoni, W. Hanke, Phys. Rev. B 65(4), 045109 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.M. Aichhorn, H.G. Evertz, W. von der Linden, M. Potthoff, Phys. Rev. B 70(23), 235107 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.H. Zhao, C.Q. Wu, H.Q. Lin, Phys. Rev. B 71(11), 115201 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.C. Zhang, E. Jeckelmann, S.R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(12), 2661 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.C. Zhang, E. Jeckelmann, S.R. White, Phys. Rev. B 60(20), 14092 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.A. Weiße, H. Fehske, G. Wellein, A.R. Bishop, Phys. Rev. B 62(2), R747 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.W.Q. Ning, H. Zhao, C.Q. Wu, H.Q. Lin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(15), 156402 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.M. Sing, U. Schwingenschlögl, R. Claessen, P. Blaha, J. Carmelo, L. Martelo, P. Sacramento, M. Dressel, C. Jacobsen, Phys. Rev. B 68(12), 125111 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar