Modeling Users of Crisis Training Environments by Integrating Psychological and Physiological Data
This paper describes aspects of a training environment for crisis decision makers who, notoriously, operate in highly stressful and unpredictable situations. Training such decision makers is the goal of Pandora-Box, a system which is able to teach a class of trainees representing different authorities that coordinate their interventions in critical situations. This paper dwells on the selection and modeling of the relevant human features that are shown to have an influence in decision making under crisis. The chosen features are used to create a trainee model on the basis of which the system adjusts the training exercises with the ultimate goal of maximizing the effectiveness of training. Trainees models are built by merging physiological and psychological data, and are represented by means of a timeline-based approach, a representation derived from planning technology. The infrastructure built for the trainee modeling constitutes the basis to assess the influence of specific variables (e.g., personality traits, self efficacy, stress and anxiety) on the performance of crisis managers during the training.
KeywordsCognitive Model Training Psychological and Physiological Data
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Adler, C., Pittinsky, T., Sommer, S., Zhu, W.: Measuring the efficacy of leaders to assess information and make decisions in a crisis: The C-LEAD Scale. Technical report, HKS faculty research Working Paper Series (2009)Google Scholar
- 3.Schoemberg, A.: Do crisis plans matter: A new perspective on leading during a crisis. Public Relations Quarterly 22, 640–657 (2005)Google Scholar
- 4.Funder, D.C.: The personality puzzle, 4th edn. Norton, NewYork (2007)Google Scholar
- 5.Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: The NEO Personality Inventory (revised) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources (1992)Google Scholar
- 6.Northouse, G.: Leadership theory and practice, 4th edn. Sage publication, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Bales, R.F.: Task roles and social roles in problem solving groups. In: Macoby, E.E., Newcomb, T.M. (eds.) Readings in Social Psychology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1958)Google Scholar
- 8.Bandura, A.: Social foundations of thought and actions. A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)Google Scholar
- 9.Salas, E., Driskell, J., Hughs, S.: The study of stress and human performance. In: Driskell, J., Salas, E. (eds.) Stress and Human Performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1996)Google Scholar
- 11.Pittinsky, T., Hadley, C., Sommer, S.: Measuring the Efficacy of Leaders to Assess Information and Make Decisions in a Crisis: The C-LEAD Scale. Technical report, Center for Public Leadership (2009)Google Scholar
- 12.Klann, G.: Crisis Leadership. Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC (2003)Google Scholar
- 16.Muscettola, N.: HSTS: Integrating Planning and Scheduling. In: Zweben, M., Fox, M.S. (eds.) Intelligent Scheduling. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)Google Scholar