EHAWC 2011: Ergonomics and Health Aspects of Work with Computers pp 78-87 | Cite as
Is the Presence of a Companion Animal Dog Beneficial for Computer Operators?
Abstract
This research was conducted to assess whether workers’ social facilitation-inhibition could be evoked by introducing a companion animal dog into the workplace or not. The experiments were carried out with three kinds of work conditions: working alone, presence of a person, and presence of a dog. There were two different discrimination tasks using PC. During each task performance, participants’ response times and the number of errors were measured to investigate their performance. Also, workers’ Heart Rates and Oxidation-Reduction Potentials of Saliva were measured to monitor their physiological changes. Before/after each performance, their emotional states, as defined by the Profile of Mood States questionnaire, were measured. The results suggest that for complex tasks, a companion animal can produce inhibition effects. However, the results also suggest that for more complex and difficult tasks, the presence of a familiar companion animal dog might produce facilitation effects.
Keywords
companion animal dog social facilitation and inhibition task performance physiological changesPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.McNair, D.M., Lorr, M., Dropplemann, L.F.: Manual for the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Educational and Industrial Testing Service, EdITS, San Diego, CA (1992)Google Scholar
- 2.Ogawa, I.: The effect of companion animal dogs on office workers to relieve job stress – an experimental study using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) -. Health Sciences 22(2), 227–239 (2006)Google Scholar
- 3.Ogawa, I., Sakamoto, T.: What is the most beneficial type of recreation for computer operators? In: Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction International 2003, vol. 3, pp. 118–122 (2003)Google Scholar
- 4.Okazawa, M.: Limitation of salivary ORP value and the confirmation of the physical condition. Journal of Medical Technology 53(7), 767–777 (2009) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- 5.Pfeifer, M.A., Cook, D., Brodsky, J., Tice, D., Reenan, A., Swedine, S., Halter, J.B., Porte, D.: Quantitative evaluation of cardiac parasympathetic activity in normal and diabetic man. Diabetes 31, 339–345 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Randall, W.C. (ed.): Selective Autonomic Innervation of the Heart: Nervous Control of Cardiovascular Function, pp. 46–67. Oxford University Press, New York (1984)Google Scholar
- 7.Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and The North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology: Heart rate variability – Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. European Heart Journal 17, 354–381 (1996)Google Scholar
- 8.Wheeler, T., Watkins, P.J.: Cardiac denervation in diabetes. Br. Med. J. 4, 584–586 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Zajonc, R.B.: Social Facilitation – A solution is suggested for an old unresolved social psychological problem. Science 149, 269–274 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar