Effects of Meeting Room Interior Design on Team Performance in a Creativity Task

  • Elsbeth de Korte
  • Lottie Kuijt
  • Rick van der Kleij
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6779)

Abstract

This study examines the effects of spatial characteristics of meeting rooms on the divergent phase in the creativity process of a group and on the mood states arousal and psychological safety. Thirty participants (12 male and 18 female) were randomly allocated to 10 mixed-gender three-person groups. They performed two creativity tasks in three different rooms: neutral, with high arousal and with high psychological safety. Overall impression of the meeting room interiors, psychological safety, arousal and creative performance were measured with questionnaires. HRV was used as physiological measure. Results showed that physical space affected arousal and the impression of the meeting rooms. HRV appeared to be a good predictor for arousal. A relation was found between HRV and idea originality. An interaction effect between meeting room interior and task was found. It may be concluded that the meeting room interior has to be adapted to the type of creativity task to gain optimal results.

Keywords

New ways of working meeting room innovation spaces team performance creativity mood arousal psychological safety heart rate variability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dul, J., Ceylan, C., Hendriks, H.: A practical instrument to measure the creativity potential of the work environment. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Creativity and Innovation, Copenhagen, Denmark, October 14-17 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., Haner, U., Janssen, S., van der Lugt, R.: Innovation spaces: towards a framework for understanding the role of the physical environment in innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management 16(1), 53–65 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewis, M., Moultrie, J.: The organizational innovation laboratory. Creativity and innovation management 14(1), 73–83 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haner, U.: Spaces for creativity and innovation in two established organizations. Creativity and innovation management 14(3), 288–298 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCoy, J.M.: Linking the physical work environment to creative context. Journal of Creative Behavior 39, 169–190 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Küller, R., Mikellides, B., Janssens, J.: Color, arousal, and performance - a comparison of three experiments. Color Research & Application 34(2), 141–152 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klitzman, S., Stellman, J.M.: The impact of the physical environment on the psychological well-being of office workers. Social Science and Medicine 29, 733–742 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knez, I., Enmarker, I.: Effects of office lighting on mood and cognitive performance and a gender effect in work-related judgment. Environment and Behavior 30, 553–567 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuijt-Evers, L.F.M., Van der Kleij, R., De Korte, E.M.: Spatial characteristics of interior spaces characterized by high psychological safety or high arousal level (unpublished data)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ceylan, C., Dul, J., Aytac, S.: Can the office environment stimulate a manager’s creativity? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 18(11), 1–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bodil, S.A., Karlsson, N.A., Svensson, K.A.: Using semantic environment description as a tool to evaluate car interiors. Ergonomics 46, 1408–1422 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edmondson, A.: Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 350–383 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lang, P.J.: Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications. In: Sidowski, J.B., Johnson, J.H., Williams, T.A. (eds.) Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems, pp. 119–137. Ablex, Norwood (1980); Mehrabian, A., Russell, J.A.: An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press, Boston (1974)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Dreu, C.K.W., Baas, M., Nijstad, B.A.: Hedonic tone and activation in the mood – creativity link: Towards a Dual Pathway to Creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94, 739–756 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Runco, M., Illies, J.J., Reiter-Ralmon: Explicit instructions to be creative and original – a comparison of strategies and criteria as targets with three types of divergent thinking tests. The Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving 15(1), 5–15 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goedhart, A.D., Van der Sluis, S., Houtveen, J.V., Willemsen, G., De Geus, E.J.C.: Comparison of time and frequency domain measures of RSA in ambulatory recordings. Psychophysiology 44, 203–215 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elsbeth de Korte
    • 1
    • 3
  • Lottie Kuijt
    • 1
  • Rick van der Kleij
    • 2
  1. 1.TNO Healthy LivingHoofddorpThe Netherlands
  2. 2.TNO Defense, Safety & SecuritySoesterbergThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Faculty Industrial Design EngineeringDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations