Connecting Usages with Usability Analysis through the User Experience Risk Assessment Model: A Case Study in the Tourism Domain

  • Alessandro Inversini
  • Lorenzo Cantoni
  • Davide Bolchini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6770)


Web usability evaluation methods have been traditionally considered as detached from the analysis of the actual usages of a web applications. While the former is typically delegated to web engineers or web designers, the latter seems to be a concern only for online marketing experts. Based on our previous research results, in this paper we present a holistic evaluation model that seamlessly integrates usability and usage analysis in the assessment of the communication quality of a web application. Specifically, we apply this model to the analysis of BravoFly website (a Swiss Online Travel Agent) and we illustrate how the results of this integrated evaluation can shed new light in intelligently prioritizing re-design interventions. Implications for online tourism communication managers and researchers in this area are discussed.


usability evaluation usability inspection usability testing usage analysis log files design dimensions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Poon, A.: Tourism, Technology and Competitive Strategies, Wallingford, CT. CAB International, Oxford (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buhalis, D.: eTourism: Information technology for strategic tourism management. Prentice Hall, Harlow (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buhalis, D., Spada, A.: Destination Management Systems: Criteria for success. Information Technology and Tourism 3(1), 41–58 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Werthner, H., Klein, S.: Information Technology and Tourism – A Challenging Relationship. Springer, Wien (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiang, Z., Wöber, K., Fesenmaier, D.R.: The representation of the tourism domain in search engines. Journal of Travel Research 47, 137–150 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Inversini, A., Buhalis, D.: Information Convergence in the Long Tail. The Case of Tourism Destination InformationIn. In: Hopken, W., Gretzel, U., Law, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2009, Amsterdam, Netherland, pp. 381–392. Springer, Wien (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inversini, A., Cantoni, L.: Cultural Destination Usability: The Case of Visit Bath. In: Hopken, W., Gretzel, U., Law, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2009, Amsterdam, Netherland, pp. 319–331. Springer, Wien (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Inversini, A., Cantoni, L., Bolchini, D.: Presenting UsERA: User Experience Risk Assessment Model. In: Gretzel, U., Law, R., Fuchs, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2010, Lugano, Switzerland, pp. 99–110. Springer, Wien (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cantoni, L., Ceriani, L.: Fare comunicazione online, analisi dell’attività di un sito internet attraverso i file di log. Comunicazione Italiana, Roma (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garrett, J.J.: The elements of users experience. AIGAl, NY (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuniavsky, M.: Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cantoni, L., Tardini, S.: Internet. Routledge, London (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Atterer, R., Wnuk, M., Schmidt, A.: Knowing the user’s every move: user activity tracking for website usability evaluation and implicit interaction. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, Edinburgh, Scotland (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pitkow, J.: In search of reliable usage data on the WWW. In: Sixth International World Wide Web Conference, Santa Clara, CA, pp. 451–463 (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Douglas, A., Mills, J.E.: Staying Afloat in the Tropics: Allying a Structural Equation Model Approach to Evaluating National Tourism Organization Websites in the Caribbean. In: Law, R., Mills, J.E. (eds.) Handbook of Consumer Behavior, Tourism and the Internet, pp. 269–293 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 413–414 (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Au Yeung, T., Law, R.: Usability Evaluation of Hong Kong Hotel Websites. Information and Communication Technology in Tourism, eds. City (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brinck, T., Gergle, D., Wood, S.D.: Usability for the web. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adams, J.: Risk, p. 228. University College London Press, London (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., Wisner, B.: At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters, pp. 333–352. Routledge, London (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Triacca, L., Bolchini, D., Botturi, L., Inversini, A.: MiLE: Systematic Usability Evaluation for E-learning Web Applications. In: Proceedings of EDMEDIA 2004, Lugano, Switzerland, pp. 4398–4405 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Triacca, L., Inversini, A., Bolchini, D.: Evaluating Web Usability with MiLE+. In: Proc. Seventh International Symposium on Web Site Evolution (WSE 2005), Budapest, September 22-29 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bolchini, D., Garzotto, F.: Quality and Potential for Adoption of Web Usability Evaluation Methods: An Empirical Study on MILE+. Journal of Web Engineering 7(4), 299–317 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Inversini
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Cantoni
    • 1
  • Davide Bolchini
    • 2
  1., School of Communication ScienceUniversità della Svizzera ItalianaLuganoSwitzerland
  2. 2.User Simulation & Experience Research Lab, School of InformaticsIndiana UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations