Exploring the Learning Problems and Resources Usage of Undergraduate Industrial Design Students in Design Studio

  • Wenzhi Chen
  • Hsien-Hui Tang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6769)

Abstract

Design is a power weapon of modern companies. It is important to have excellent designers for the industry. The purpose of this study is to explore the learning problems, and the resources that students used to overcome problems in undergraduate industrial design studio courses. The survey with open type questionnaires was used to collect data. There were 189 undergraduate industrial design students from 3 universities participating in this study. The results demonstrated that the most difficulties design tasks included concept generation, design presentation, and design research. The learning resources used to solve the learning problems included 4 categories: people, object, method, and environment. This information can increase the understanding of the learning process of students, and provide the reference for teaching planning and the setting of the learning resources in design education.

Keywords

Industrial design learning problems learning resources design studio 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arsham, H.: Impact of the Internet on learning and teaching. USDLA Journal 16(3) (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zimring, C., Latch Craig, D.: Defining design between domains: an argument for design research? la caret. In: Eastman, C.M., McCracken, W.M., Newsletter, W.C. (eds.) Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education, pp. 125–146. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schön, D.A.: Education the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass, London (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bucciarelli, L.L.: Design knowledge & learning: a socially mediated activity. In: Eastman, C.M., McCracken, W.M., Newsletter, W.C. (eds.) Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education, pp. 297–314 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reimer, Y.J., Douglas, S.A.: Teaching HCI design with studio approach. Computer science education 13(3), 191–205 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Attoe, W., Mugerauer, R.: Excellent studio teaching in architecture. Studies in Higher Education 16(1), 41–50 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Budd, J., Vanka, S., Runton, A.: The ID-Online asynchronous learning network: a ’Virtual Studio’ for interdisciplinary design collaboration. Digital Creativity 10(4), 205–214 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forgber, U., Russell, P.: Interdisciplinary collaboration in the virtual design studio, Plymouth, England (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, D., Hedley, P., Molloy, M.: Design learning: a reflective model. Design Studies 30(1), 13–37 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang, T.-W., Huang, J.-H.: A pilot study of role-interplay in a web-based learning environment. Education Media International 39(1), 75–85 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang, P.-F., Hsiau, S.-S., Yeh, T.-L., Wu, J.-C.: The development and implementation of the technological creativity course: an interdisciplinary approach. In: International Conference of Engineering Education (ICEE), Taipei, Taiwan (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pirrie, A., Hamilton, S., Wilson, V.: Multidisciplinary education: some issues and concerns. Educational Research 41(3), 301–314 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, M., You, M., Chen, F.: A study on the difficulties and career guidance needs of industrial design students: implications for design education. Journal of Design (TW) 10(2), 57–76 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mawson, B.: Designers as teachers and learners: Transferring workplace design practice into educational settings. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 17(2), 163–177 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Brown, M.I., Doughty, G.F., Draper, S.W., Henderson, F.P., Mcateer, E.: Measuring learning resource use. Computers & Education 27(2), 103–113 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chiu, S.-H.: Students’ knowledge sources and knowledge sharing in the design studio—an exploratory study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 20(1), 27–42 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    You, M., Yang, M.-Y., Liao, P.: Survey of industrial design students’ learning attitudes. Journal of Design (TW) 12(2), 15–36 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tempelman, E., Pilot, A.: Strengthening the link between theory and practice in teaching design engineering: an empirical study on a new approach. International Journal of Technology and Design Education (in press)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Studio Teaching Toolkit: What is Studio? Current Models, http://www.studioteaching.org/index.php?page=current_models

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenzhi Chen
    • 1
  • Hsien-Hui Tang
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Industrial DesignChang Gung UniversityTao-YuanTaiwan, R.O.C.
  2. 2.Department of Commercial and Industrial DesignNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations