Ethnography, Ethnography or Ethnography? What Happens When the Same Word Means Different Things to Different People?

  • Sasanka Prabhala
  • Daria Loi
  • Subhashini Ganapathy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6769)

Abstract

This paper discusses how the notion and practice of ethnography differs for practitioners with different disciplinary backgrounds, especially in a context where ethnography exits academia to enter industry contexts. The paper is divided into four sections. The first provides background to specific experiences and briefly over-views existing literature. In the second part we compare our experiences through an industry case study. The third section proposes a taxonomy, suggesting a number of implications, and providing recommendations on how to integrate cross-disciplinary approaches to expand the scope of conducting user research. The final section wraps up our propositions and provides a number of recommendations.

Keywords

Design Ethnography Human Factors Interface TV UX 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sommerville, I., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., Bentley, R., Twidale, M.: Integrating ethnography into the requirements engineering process. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 165–173 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Madanmohan, T.R., Navelkar, S.: Roles and knowledge management in online technology communities: an ethnography study. International Journal of Web Based Communities 1, 71–89 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., Hughes, J.: At Home with the Technology:An Ethnographic Study of Set-Top-Box Trail. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 6(3), 282–308 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suchman, L.A.: Office procedures as practical action: Models of work and system design. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 1(4), 320–328 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, Y., Mainwaring, S.D.: Ethnography at play: An exploratory case study of Chinese user’s experience in online games. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2008 workshop on evaluating user experiences in games, Florence, Italy (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harper, R., Hughes, J., Shapiro, D.: Harmonious working and CSCW: Computer technology and air traffic control. In: Benford, S.D., Bowers, J.M. (eds.) Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work Theory, Practice and Design. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ackroyd, S., Harper, R., Shapiro, D., Hughes, J.: Information Technology and Practical Police Work. Open University Press, Milton Keynes (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maguire, M.: Methods to support human-centered design. International Journal of Human-Computer studies 55(4), 587–634 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phillips, C.A., Repperger, D.W., Reynolds, D.B.: Human Factors Engineering. Wiley Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salvador, T., Bell, G., Anderson, K.: Design Ethnography. Design Management Journal 10(4), 35–41 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schuler, D., Namioka, A.: Participatory design: Principles and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forlizzi, J., Battarbee, K.: Understanding experience in interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Processes, Practices, Methods and Techniques, pp. 261–288 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bruseberg, A., McDonagh-Philp, D.: New product development by eliciting user experience and aspirations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55(4), 435–452 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, http://www.hfes.org/
  16. 16.
    Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D.P.: Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gaver, B., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E.: Cultural Probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21–29 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loi, D.: The Book of Probes, in Lavoretti per Bimbi–Playful Triggers as keys to foster collaborative practices and workspaces where people learn, wonder and play. PhD Thesis, RMIT University, Melbourne Australia (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loi, D.: Reflective Probes, Primitive Probes and Playful Triggers. In: EPIC07–Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference, Keystone, CO (October 3-6, 2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loi, D.: Digital home storage beyond devices: a cross cultural perspective on how people keep, protect and find what they value. Keynote, UPA Europe–European Usability Professionals Association Conference, Turin Italy (December 4-6, 2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Intel Corporation: Consumer Electronics – Widget Channel Overview, http://www.intelconsumerelectronics.com/Consumer-Electronics-3.0/Widget-Channel-Overview.aspx
  22. 22.
    Loi, D.: Changing the TV industry through user experience design. In: 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Orlando, Florida (July 9-14, 2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sasanka Prabhala
    • 1
  • Daria Loi
    • 1
  • Subhashini Ganapathy
    • 2
  1. 1.Intel CorporationHillsboroU.S.A.
  2. 2.Intel CorporationBeavertonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations