Advertisement

Abstract

As we move more to a digital economy and integrate technology every more completely in all aspects of life there is a looming crisis for a growing number of increasingly marginalized individuals. The accessibility technologies we have are meeting the needs of only some, at high cost – and will not work with many new technologies. In addition, the pace and path of technological change predestines these approaches to fail in the very near future. At the same time, the incidence of disabilities is increasing as our population ages. The same technical advances however hold the key for a radical paradigm shift in our approach to accessibility that can harness the pace of innovation and have it work for us rather than against us. Proposed is the development of a Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII) that can tap the unprecedented ability to pool resources and match demand with supply enabled by the Cloud to deliver accessibility to every individual where they need it, when they need it and in a way that matches their unique requirements; automatically so that they do not need to negotiate, explain, qualify or justify.

Keywords

digital divide universal design cloud computing personalization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vanderheiden, G.: In: the Matter of Broadband Accessibility for People with Disabilities - Workshop II, Barriers, Opportunities, and Policy Recommendations, GN Docket Nos. 09-47, 09-51 and 09-137 (October 7, 2009) http://fcc.gov//document=7020040929
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Cooper, A.: The inmates are running the asylum: why high tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Sams Publishing, Indianapolis (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    ASK-IT FP6 Integrated Project. ASK-IT Ontological Framework: Public Deliverable D1.7.1 Technical report (2007), http://www.ask-it.org/
  6. 6.
    AEGIS FP7 IP EC project (Grant number 224348), http://www.aegis-project.eu/
  7. 7.
    ACCESSIBLE FP7 strep EC project (Grant number 224145) -, http://www.accessible-project.eu/
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N., Kinny, D.: The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3(3), 285–312 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Heijst, G., Schreiber, A.T., Wielinga, B.J.: Understanding, building, and using ontologies: a commentary to using explicit Ontologies in KBS development, LADSEB-CNR, National Research Council (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Petrie, H., Weber, G., Fisher, W.: Personalization, interaction, and navigation in rich multimedia documents for print-disabled users. IBM Systems Journal 44(3), 629–636 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Individualized Adaptability and Accessibility in ELearning, Education and Training. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC36 International Standard 24751, parts 1 2 and 3 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregg Vanderheiden
    • 1
  • Jutta Treviranus
    • 2
  1. 1.Trace R&D CenterUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Inclusive Design Resource CenterOCAD UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations