Advertisement

The Barriers to and Benefits of Use of ICT for People with Visual Impairment

  • Kristin Skeide Fuglerud
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6765)

Abstract

This paper reports results from a focus group interview and a field study, which includes 28 visually impaired PC users in Norway. The main goal of the study was to identify benefits of, and barriers to, use of ICT for the visually impaired, and to propose measures to remove barriers. The use of Internet services, mobile phones, kiosks, ticket machines, ATMs, and queuing management systems, were studied. Visually impaired users’ encounters with technology were investigated through a focus group interview, observation of task-solving activities, and semi-structured interviews. The analysis revealed that several commonly used ICT services, such as online banking, electronic forms, and learning material have major accessibility problems. The first barrier is often mechanisms for registration and authentication. The proliferation of inaccessible everyday technologies, unstable systems, and lack of training constitutes other major challenges. Based on the findings some suggestions for further development and research priorities are suggested.

Keywords

accessibility universal design visually impaired assistive technology self-service terminals queuing systems user diversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hanssen, G.S., Winsvold, M.: Local e-democracy: On ICT mediated participation among people with disabilities (in Norwegian) NIBR (2006) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rønning, T.: Everyday technology for all - or nearly all (in Norwegian). Norges Blinde, vol. 2004. NABP, Oslo (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fuglerud, K.S., Solheim, I.: ICT-barriers for the visually impaired (in Norwegian). Report, Norwegian Computing Center (2008) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lazar, J., Allen, A., Kleinman, J., Malarkey, C.: What Frustrates Screen Reader Users on the Web: A Study of 100 Blind Users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 22, 247–269 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zúnica, R.R., Clemente, V.Á.: Research on Internet use by Spanish-speaking users with blindness and partial sight. Universal Access in the Information Society 6, 103–110 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hailpern, J., Guarino-Reid, L., Boardman, R., Annam, S.: Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new world. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 821–830. ACM, Madrid (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dini, S., Ferlino, L., Gettani, A., Martinoli, C., Ott, M.: Educational software and low vision students: evaluating accessibility factors. Universal Access in the Information Society 6, 15–29 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buzzi, M., Buzzi, M., Leporini, B.: Accessing e-Learning Systems via Screen Reader: An Example. In: Jacko, J. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains, vol. 5613, pp. 21–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buzzi, M.C., Buzzi, M., Leporini, B., Mori, G., Penichet, V.M.R.: Accessing Google Docs via Screen Reader. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6179, pp. 92–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leporini, B., Paternò, F.: Increasing usability when interacting through screen readers. Universal Access in the Information Society 3, 57–70 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rømen, D., Svanæs, D.: Validating WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 through Usability Testing with Disabled Users. In: Sandnes, F.E., et al. (eds.) Unitech 2010, pp. 168–189. Tapir Academic Publishers, Oslo (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murphy, E., Kuber, R., McAllister, G., Strain, P., Yu, W.: An empirical investigation into the difficulties experienced by visually impaired Internet users. Universal Access in the Information Society 7, 79–91 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arnim, D., Piuzzi, B., Nam, C., Chung, D.: Guidelines for the development and improvement of universal access systems for blind students. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 603–612. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shinohara, K., Tenenberg, J.: A blind person’s interactions with technology. Commun. ACM 52, 58–66 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Minifie, D., Coady, Y.: Getting mobile with mobile devices: using the web to improve transit accessibility. In: W4A 2009, pp. 123–126. ACM, Madrid (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Azenkot, S., Fortuna, E.: Improving public transit usability for blind and deaf-blind people by connecting a braille display to a smartphone. In: ASSETS 2010, pp. 317–318. ACM, Orlando (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fritsch, L., Fuglerud, K.S., Solheim, I.: Towards Inclusive Identity Management. Identity in the Information Society 3, 515–538 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tollefsen, T., Dale, Ø., Berg, M., Nordby, R.: Connected! A paper about the disabled and the use of social media., MediaLT (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Norwegian Computing Center: ICT barriers for the Visually Disabled, http://www.nr.no/pages/dart/project_flyer_synshemmedes_ikt_barrierer

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristin Skeide Fuglerud
    • 1
  1. 1.Norsk RegnesentralBlindernNorway

Personalised recommendations