Advertisement

Visual Mediation Mechanisms for Collaborative Design and Development

  • Carmelo Ardito
  • Barbara Rita Barricelli
  • Paolo Buono
  • Maria Francesca Costabile
  • Antonio Piccinno
  • Stefano Valtolina
  • Li Zhu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6765)

Abstract

Collaborative design involving end users has emerged as a response to the needs felt by various organizations of adapting software to specific environments and users. During time, users and environments evolve; this is another reason why software has to be modified. Different stakeholders, including consultants, designers internal to the organization and, recently, end users, have to collaborate among themselves, and possibly with the software providers, to shape software. Such stakeholders face fundamental challenges in learning how to communicate and in building a shared understanding. Researchers are now addressing such challenges. This paper contributes to this innovative research by formally defining visual mediation mechanisms for collaborative design. A case study illustrating their application is discussed.

Keywords

collaborative design mediation mechanisms end-user development meta-design communities of practice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Software Engineering Institute: Ultra-Large-Scale Systems: The Software Challenge of the Future, http://www.sei.cmu.edu (last access on February 22, 2010)
  2. 2.
    Fischer, G.: Cultures of Participation and Social Computing: Rethinking and Reinventing Learning and Education. In: Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 1–5. IEEE Computer Society, Riga (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.): End User Development, vol. 9. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, London (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fischer, G.: Extending Boundaries with Meta-Design and Cultures of Participation. In: 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI 2010), pp. 168–177. ACM, Reykjavik (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boulle, L.: Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice. LexisNexis Butterworths, Chatswood (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wiederhold, G.: Mediators in the Architecture of Future Information Systems. Computer 25(3), 38–49 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burstein, M.H., McDermott, D.V.: Ontology Translation for Interoperability among Semantic Web Services. AI Magazine - Special issue on Semantic Integration 26(1), 71–82 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaculin, R., Neruda, R., Sycara, K.: The Process Mediation Framework for Semantic Web Services. International Journal of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering 3(1), 27–58 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhu, L., Mussio, P., Barricelli, B.R.: Hive-Mind Space Model for Creative, Collaborative Design. In: 1st DESIRE Network Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, Desire Network, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 121–130 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costabile, M.F., Fogli, D., Mussio, P., Piccinno, A.: Visual Interactive Systems for End-User Development: A Model-Based Design Methodology. IEEE T. Syst. Man Cy. A 37(6), 1029–1046 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carlile, P.R.: A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science 13(4), 442–455 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jennings, P.: Tangible Social Interfaces: Critical Theory, Boundary Objects and Interdisciplinary Design Methods. In: 5th Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C), pp. 176–186. ACM, London (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Resnick, L., Levine, J., Teasley, S.: Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association, APA (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fong, A., Valerdi, R., Srinivasan, J.: Boundary Objects as a Framework to Understand the Role of Systems Integrators. Systems Research Forum 2(1), 11–18 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmelo Ardito
    • 1
  • Barbara Rita Barricelli
    • 2
  • Paolo Buono
    • 1
  • Maria Francesca Costabile
    • 1
  • Antonio Piccinno
    • 1
  • Stefano Valtolina
    • 2
  • Li Zhu
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità degli Studi di BariBariItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Informatica e ComunicazioneUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations