Menu Design of Digital Photo Frame for Older Users

  • Hsiu-Ping Yueh
  • Weijane Lin
  • Tzu-Yi Lu
  • Yen-Lian Chou
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6775)

Abstract

The advancement of image technology has escalated the development of digital camera devices and shifted the way people view and store photos. Touch screen digital photo frame, as a marginal product with the digitalization, also becomes commonly and widely accepted. With the senior citizens on the rapid increase that structurally changed with the aging society, unignorable attentions should be paid to methods for more friendly and user-centered design of digital devices for improving elder users’ experience. This study set out to examine elders’ performance and preferences for menu design of digital photo frame. Research data was collected from 24 subjects using the paper prototyping method. Results of this study show the preference toward exhaustive but not burden display, habitually perceivable message structure, and slightly magnified size for both the display and icons. This study concludes with the suggestions to future research and design practices of digital photo frame.

Keywords

Menu design Icon design Digital photo frame Paper prototype Gerontology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Albinsson, P.-A., Zhai, S.: High precision touch screen interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 105–112 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Apted, T., Kay, J., Quigley, A.: Tabletop sharing of digital photographs for the elderly. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 781–790 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi, Y.-S., Lee, J.-H., Koo, B.-K.: Wireless LAN-based digital photo frame display images with NPR effects. Paper presented at the Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Digest of Technical Papers International Conference on (January 9-13, 2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Concil for Economic Planning and Development, Population Projections for Taiwan: 2010-2060, Taipei (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dahl, D.W., Hoeffler, S.: Visualizing the self: Exploring the potential benefits and drawbacks for new product evaluation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21(4), 259–267 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davies, S., Nolan, M.: ’Making it better’: Self-perceived roles of family caregivers of older people living in care homes: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 43(3), 281–291 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Voegt, K., Feki, M., Claeys, L., Criel, J., Zontrop, P., Godon, M., Roelands, M., Geerts, M., Trappeniers, L.: Augmented Photoframe for Interactive Smart Space. In: Lee, Y., Bien, Z., Mokhtari, M., Kim, J., Park, M., Kim, J., Lee, H., Khalil, I. (eds.) ICOST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6159, pp. 60–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals(VDTs)- part 11: Guidance on usability (vol. 9241-11): ISO (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frohlich, D., Kuchinsky, A., Pering, C., Don, A., Ariss, S.: Requirements for photoware. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 166–175 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall, A.D., Cunningham, J.B., Roache, R.P., Cox, J.W.: Factors Affecting Performance Using Touch-Entry Systems: Tactual Recognition Fields and System Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology 73(4), 711–720 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoeffler, S., Ariely, D.: Constructing stable preferences: A look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability. Journal of Consumer Psychology 8(2), 113–139 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jin, Z., Plocher, T., Kiff, L.: Touch Screen User Interfaces for Older Adults: Button Size and Spacing. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 933–941. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Rother, C., Wood, K.: Understanding photowork. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 761–770 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liddle, D.: Design of the conceptual model. In: Bringing Design to Software, pp. 17–36. ACM, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2), 81–97 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morimoto, K., Kurokawa, T., Takemoto, K., Hori, T., Kushiro, N., Inoue, M.: Protocol Analysis on Usability of Remote Controllers of Household Appliances for Elderly People. Paper presented at the 5th Asian Design Conference, Korea (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nakata, T. (1998) Counting Effective Number of Buttons: An Informational Analysis of Input Device Performance, http://www.staff.aist.go.jp/toru-nakata/numbutton.pdf (retrieved 2010/11/01)
  18. 18.
    Narayanan, S., Bailey, W., Tendulkar, J., Daley, R.: Design of model-based interfaces for a real world information system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 32(1), 11–24 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Opalinski, L.: Older Adults and the Digital Divide: Assessing Results of a Web-Based Survey. Journal of Technology in Human Services 18(3), 203–221 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rodden, K., Wood, K.R.: How do people manage their digital photographs. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 409–416 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saunders, E.J.: Maximizing computer use among the elderly in rural senior centers. Educational Gerontology 30(7), 573–585 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sears, A.: Improving touchscreen keyboards: design issues and a comparison with other devices. Interacting with Computers 3(3), 253–269 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sears, A., Revis, D., Swatski, J., Crittenden, R., Shneiderman, B.: Investigating touchscreen typing: the effect of keyboard size on typing speed. Behaviour and Information Technology 12(1), 17–22 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Senol, M.B., Dagdeviren, M., Cilingir, C., Kurt, M.: Display panel design of a general utility helicopter by applying quantitative and qualitative approaches. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 20(1), 73–86 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shneiderman, B.: Touch Screens Now Offer Compelling Uses. IEEE Software 8(2), 93–94, 107 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siek, K.A., Rogers, Y., Connelly, K.H.: Fat Finger Worries: How Older and Younger Users Physically Interact with PDAs. In: Costabile, M.F., Paternó, F. (eds.) INTERACT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3585, pp. 267–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weiss, S.: Handheld usability. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, p. 412 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zajicek, M.: Interface design for older adults. In: Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly, pp. 60–65 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hsiu-Ping Yueh
    • 1
  • Weijane Lin
    • 2
  • Tzu-Yi Lu
    • 1
  • Yen-Lian Chou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Bio-Industry Communication and DevelopmentNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, R.O.C.
  2. 2.Department of Library and Information ScienceNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations